H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 1-2
Coco Vandeweghe holds a 2–1 lead over Caroline Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Coco Vandeweghe leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2018 Stuttgart semifinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2018* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Coco Vandeweghe | 6-4 6-2 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2015* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Coco Vandeweghe | 6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(6) | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2014* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 6-3 6-2 | Coco Vandeweghe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Coco Vandeweghe | #815 | #9 | 3,258 | 1,877 | 138 | 151 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Garcia | Coco Vandeweghe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #476 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #322 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #113 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #241 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #174 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,533 | 0 | 2 |