H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 2-2
Caroline Garcia and Ekaterina Makarova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Caroline Garcia leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Ekaterina Makarova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2018 Dubai fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2018* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 6-4 6-2 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2017* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Ekaterina Makarova | 7-5 6-3 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2013 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 6-2 6-0 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Garcia | Ekaterina Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |