H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Julia Goerges H2H: 3-0
Caroline Garcia holds a 3–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Caroline Garcia leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2019 Miami third round 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2019* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 6-0 7-5 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| May 10, 2018* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Caroline Garcia | 6-2 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2016 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 4-6 6-3 5-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Caroline Garcia | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |
| 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |