H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Caroline Garcia vs Madison Brengle H2H: 4-1

Caroline Garcia holds a 4–1 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Caroline Garcia leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2023 Eastbourne Open round of 32 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Caroline Garcia
France Age 32 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main-draw meetings
Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Caroline Garcia #5 6-1 7-5 Madison Brengle #114 Match data Jun 29, 2023* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 500 Grass
Caroline Garcia #46 6-7(5) 6-2 6-2 Madison Brengle #95 Match data Jan 22, 2020* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Caroline Garcia #22 6-4 6-3 Madison Brengle #95 Match data Jul 9, 2017* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Caroline Garcia #24 6-2 4-6 6-3 Madison Brengle #86 Match data Feb 15, 2017* R32 Qatar Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Madison Brengle #43 3-6 6-3 6-3 Caroline Garcia #29 Match data Apr 25, 2015* QF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Caroline Garcia #452 #4 5,170 2,002 337 268 55.7% 0 3 1 0 7 11
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Caroline Garcia Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 2–4 33.3% #142 1,481 0 0 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 2012 1–6 14.3% #154 1,445 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 2013 8–14 36.4% #74 1,482 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0
20 2014 24–23 51.1% #37 1,662 0 1 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2015 28–24 53.8% #34 1,706 0 1 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0
22 2016 32–24 57.1% #24 1,744 0 3 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2017 48–22 68.6% #8 1,974 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 2018 39–22 63.9% #19 1,922 0 6 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0
25 2019 24–24 50.0% #46 1,719 0 7 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 2020 11–11 50.0% #43 1,745 0 7 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 2021 21–24 46.7% #74 1,694 0 7 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 2022 44–20 68.8% #4 1,984 0 11 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0
29 2023 36–26 58.1% #20 1,832 0 11 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 2024 15–15 50.0% #48 1,763 0 11 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0
31 2025 4–9 30.8% #304 1,723 0 11 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Caroline Garcia Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2014 12 15 27 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 21 16 37 56.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 19 17 36 52.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 30 14 44 68.2% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 24 15 39 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2021 12 16 28 42.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2022 23 14 37 62.2% 11 3 14 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2023 26 19 45 57.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2024 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2025 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 201 181 382 52.6% 92 62 154 59.7% 44 24 68 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 568/605 of Caroline Garcia's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Caroline Garcia Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 6/6 4.8 6.8 56.1% 65.4% 41.9% 59.0% 47.0% 55.5% 40.6% 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 2012 7/7 3.1 8.6 53.2% 69.6% 38.1% 46.5% 51.6% 54.7% 40.5% 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 2013 19/22 4.5 5.2 58.7% 66.4% 44.4% 53.4% 39.9% 57.2% 36.5% 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 2014 43/47 3.7 4.2 59.0% 65.3% 46.8% 53.2% 37.7% 57.7% 39.9% 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2015 43/52 4.3 4.2 65.3% 67.1% 54.0% 53.7% 49.4% 62.2% 38.3% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 2016 48/56 4.1 2.9 60.5% 65.9% 50.1% 48.2% 44.0% 59.7% 41.3% 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2017 66/70 5.0 2.9 63.6% 67.4% 50.7% 56.8% 46.3% 61.4% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 60/61 4.1 2.2 67.1% 65.9% 52.1% 57.7% 47.2% 61.4% 41.3% 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 2019 48/48 4.0 2.1 67.3% 64.4% 50.8% 55.3% 43.5% 59.7% 39.7% 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 2020 22/22 3.5 2.9 62.0% 63.6% 48.2% 57.3% 43.1% 57.5% 39.4% 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 2021 44/45 3.8 2.7 62.5% 62.9% 49.4% 53.2% 46.8% 57.8% 40.8% 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 2022 63/64 6.4 3.1 60.9% 71.6% 48.8% 60.0% 49.2% 62.6% 39.9% 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 2023 62/62 7.3 3.3 60.2% 72.6% 49.5% 63.5% 42.9% 63.4% 38.5% 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 2024 28/30 7.4 3.4 59.1% 71.5% 45.7% 56.9% 41.2% 61.0% 38.2% 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 2025 9/13 3.6 2.1 60.1% 60.1% 43.7% 44.1% 49.0% 53.8% 38.4% 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
Career — 568/605 4.9 3.2 62.3% 67.3% 49.4% 55.9% 45.1% 60.4% 40.0% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Caroline Garcia Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1481 101.2 -0.19 -2.02 0.913 48.6% +22 — — 43.8% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.70 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 2012 1445 110.6 -0.32 -1.39 0.894 47.7% +27 — — 29.4% -0.88 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.9 +0.20 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40
19 2013 1482 118.4 +1.16 -4.52 0.853 47.3% +6 +27 — 43.1% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 94.0 +0.45 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06
20 2014 1663 133.8 +1.54 -2.76 0.944 49.0% -72 +18 -59 47.6% -0.30 9–6 (60%) 10–4 (71%) 110.4 -0.60 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2015 1707 139.3 +3.93 -2.34 1.013 50.3% +9 -53 -109 52.5% +0.25 8–12 (40%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -0.37 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2016 1744 133.4 +3.27 -1.52 1.024 50.5% -17 -73 -40 53.9% +0.16 11–9 (55%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -0.69 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2017 1974 148.7 +4.65 -0.54 1.105 52.2% -2 -211 -177 62.7% +0.87 16–5 (76%) 12–9 (57%) 110.2 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 1923 152.6 +4.38 -0.48 1.070 51.3% +7 -19 -150 60.4% +0.59 13–8 (62%) 7–12 (37%) 99.7 -0.23 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 2019 1719 131.2 +2.32 -2.18 0.987 49.9% +13 +100 +151 47.3% -0.06 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +0.62 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 2020 1746 124.7 +0.99 -2.03 0.927 48.5% -43 +95 — 47.2% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.44 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 2021 1694 129.7 +0.83 -1.96 0.965 49.5% -2 +114 +171 46.6% -0.36 7–6 (54%) 6–3 (67%) 103.5 +0.68 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74
28 2022 1985 150.7 +5.57 -1.70 1.069 51.6% -48 -49 +11 63.0% +0.79 16–6 (73%) 12–15 (44%) 104.3 -0.40 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 2023 1832 148.1 +5.79 -3.68 1.052 51.1% +23 +46 +145 57.2% +0.39 12–11 (52%) 11–11 (50%) 97.2 +4.38 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29
30 2024 1764 138.5 +3.01 -3.41 0.979 49.7% +38 +75 — 47.0% -0.20 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 +0.58 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 2025 1723 135.1 -1.26 -0.80 0.832 46.2% +37 — — 34.5% -0.97 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.50 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2003 145.7 +3.40 -2.00 1.011 50.4% -5 -5 +3 53.4% +0.18 117–90 (57%) 94–87 (52%) 104.3 +0.93 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.