H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Caroline Garcia vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 1-2

Marina Erakovic holds a 2–1 lead over Caroline Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marina Erakovic leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2017 Taipei round of 32 6-3 6-2.

France Age 32 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 2
3 main-draw meetings
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Caroline Garcia #25 6-3 6-2 Marina Erakovic #110 Match data Feb 2, 2017* R32 Taipei International modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Marina Erakovic #87 6-2 4-6 6-4 Caroline Garcia #34 Match data Oct 9, 2014* R32 Linz Open International modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Marina Erakovic #85 6-4 4-6 6-4 Caroline Garcia #135 Match data Sep 15, 2011* R32 Quebec City International modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Caroline Garcia #452 #4 5,170 2,002 337 268 55.7% 0 3 1 0 7 11
Marina Erakovic #827 #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Caroline Garcia Marina Erakovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 2–4 33.3% #142 1,481 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0
18 2012 1–6 14.3% #154 1,445 0 0
19 2013 8–14 36.4% #74 1,482 0 0 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0
20 2014 24–23 51.1% #37 1,662 0 1 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0
21 2015 28–24 53.8% #34 1,706 0 1 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0
22 2016 32–24 57.1% #24 1,744 0 3 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0
23 2017 48–22 68.6% #8 1,974 0 5 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0
24 2018 39–22 63.9% #19 1,922 0 6 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0
25 2019 24–24 50.0% #46 1,719 0 7 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,669 0 1
26 2020 11–11 50.0% #43 1,745 0 7 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1
27 2021 21–24 46.7% #74 1,694 0 7 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1
28 2022 44–20 68.8% #4 1,984 0 11 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1
29 2023 36–26 58.1% #20 1,832 0 11 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1
30 2024 15–15 50.0% #48 1,763 0 11
31 2025 4–9 30.8% #304 1,723 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Caroline Garcia Marina Erakovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2012 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 1 5 6 16.7%
20 2014 12 15 27 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
21 2015 21 16 37 56.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2009 4 7 11 36.4%
22 2016 19 17 36 52.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 1 7 85.7% 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2017 30 14 44 68.2% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2018 24 15 39 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2021 12 16 28 42.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2022 23 14 37 62.2% 11 3 14 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2023 26 19 45 57.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2024 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2025 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 201 181 382 52.6% 92 62 154 59.7% 44 24 68 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 568/605 of Caroline Garcia's and 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Caroline Garcia Marina Erakovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 6/6 4.8 6.8 56.1% 65.4% 41.9% 59.0% 47.0% 55.5% 40.6% —/—
18 2012 7/7 3.1 8.6 53.2% 69.6% 38.1% 46.5% 51.6% 54.7% 40.5% —/—
19 2013 19/22 4.5 5.2 58.7% 66.4% 44.4% 53.4% 39.9% 57.2% 36.5% 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8%
20 2014 43/47 3.7 4.2 59.0% 65.3% 46.8% 53.2% 37.7% 57.7% 39.9% 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8%
21 2015 43/52 4.3 4.2 65.3% 67.1% 54.0% 53.7% 49.4% 62.2% 38.3% 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2%
22 2016 48/56 4.1 2.9 60.5% 65.9% 50.1% 48.2% 44.0% 59.7% 41.3% 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6%
23 2017 66/70 5.0 2.9 63.6% 67.4% 50.7% 56.8% 46.3% 61.4% 42.6% 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5%
24 2018 60/61 4.1 2.2 67.1% 65.9% 52.1% 57.7% 47.2% 61.4% 41.3% 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6%
25 2019 48/48 4.0 2.1 67.3% 64.4% 50.8% 55.3% 43.5% 59.7% 39.7% 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4%
26 2020 22/22 3.5 2.9 62.0% 63.6% 48.2% 57.3% 43.1% 57.5% 39.4% 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9%
27 2021 44/45 3.8 2.7 62.5% 62.9% 49.4% 53.2% 46.8% 57.8% 40.8% 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0%
28 2022 63/64 6.4 3.1 60.9% 71.6% 48.8% 60.0% 49.2% 62.6% 39.9% 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0%
29 2023 62/62 7.3 3.3 60.2% 72.6% 49.5% 63.5% 42.9% 63.4% 38.5% 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1%
30 2024 28/30 7.4 3.4 59.1% 71.5% 45.7% 56.9% 41.2% 61.0% 38.2% —/—
31 2025 9/13 3.6 2.1 60.1% 60.1% 43.7% 44.1% 49.0% 53.8% 38.4% —/—
Career 568/605 4.9 3.2 62.3% 67.3% 49.4% 55.9% 45.1% 60.4% 40.0% 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Caroline Garcia Marina Erakovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1481 101.2 -0.19 -2.02 0.913 48.6% +22 43.8% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–0 +0.70 2005 1498 95.1 40.0% -1.00 1–0 +0.29
18 2012 1445 110.6 -0.32 -1.39 0.894 47.7% +27 29.4% -0.88 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.9 +0.20
19 2013 1482 118.4 +1.16 -4.52 0.853 47.3% +6 +27 43.1% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 94.0 +0.45 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +5 21.4% -1.36 1–1 +0.10
20 2014 1663 133.8 +1.54 -2.76 0.944 49.0% -72 +18 -59 47.6% -0.30 9–6 (60%) 10–4 (71%) 110.4 -0.60 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -43 +12 +208 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05
21 2015 1707 139.3 +3.93 -2.34 1.013 50.3% +9 -53 -109 52.5% +0.25 8–12 (40%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -0.37 2009 1514 108.9 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -38 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 -0.07
22 2016 1744 133.4 +3.27 -1.52 1.024 50.5% -17 -73 -40 53.9% +0.16 11–9 (55%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -0.69 2010 1480 102.7 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -44 +254 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) -0.06
23 2017 1974 148.7 +4.65 -0.54 1.105 52.2% -2 -211 -177 62.7% +0.87 16–5 (76%) 12–9 (57%) 110.2 +0.32 2011 1627 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -74 +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 +0.24
24 2018 1923 152.6 +4.38 -0.48 1.070 51.3% +7 -19 -150 60.4% +0.59 13–8 (62%) 7–12 (37%) 99.7 -0.23 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -33 +124 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89
25 2019 1719 131.2 +2.32 -2.18 0.987 49.9% +13 +100 +151 47.3% -0.06 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +0.62 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -29 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26
26 2020 1746 124.7 +0.99 -2.03 0.927 48.5% -43 +95 47.2% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.44 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +39 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) -0.33
27 2021 1694 129.7 +0.83 -1.96 0.965 49.5% -2 +114 +171 46.6% -0.36 7–6 (54%) 6–3 (67%) 103.5 +0.68 2015 1542 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +77 -39 +69 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36
28 2022 1985 150.7 +5.57 -1.70 1.069 51.6% -48 -49 +11 63.0% +0.79 16–6 (73%) 12–15 (44%) 104.3 -0.40 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55
29 2023 1832 148.1 +5.79 -3.68 1.052 51.1% +23 +46 +145 57.2% +0.39 12–11 (52%) 11–11 (50%) 97.2 +4.38 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) -0.44
30 2024 1764 138.5 +3.01 -3.41 0.979 49.7% +38 +75 47.0% -0.20 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 +0.58
31 2025 1724 135.4 -1.26 -0.80 0.832 46.2% +37 34.5% -0.97 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.54
Career 2003 145.7 +3.40 -2.00 1.011 50.4% -5 -5 +3 53.4% +0.18 117–90 (57%) 94–87 (52%) 104.3 +0.92 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.