H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Naomi Broady H2H: 0-1
Naomi Broady holds a 1–0 lead over Caroline Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Broady leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Naomi Broady won the 2011 Birmingham second round 6-2 6-7(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 36
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2011* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Naomi Broady | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Naomi Broady | #1,209 | #76 | 875 | 1,604 | 24 | 41 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Garcia | Naomi Broady | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #117 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #250 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |