H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Teliana Pereira H2H: 1-0
Caroline Garcia holds a 1–0 lead over Teliana Pereira in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Caroline Garcia leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 6-1 6-2 | Teliana Pereira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,002 | 336 | 266 | 55.8% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Teliana Pereira | #1,102 | #43 | 1,136 | 1,644 | 30 | 47 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Garcia | Teliana Pereira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #24 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,920 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #97 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #107 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #74 | 1,693 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #206 | 1,472 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,984 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,451 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,833 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,764 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |