H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Yafan Wang H2H: 1-2
Yafan Wang holds a 2–1 lead over Caroline Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yafan Wang leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yafan Wang won the 2023 US Open first round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 6-4 6-1 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2019* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 6-4 6-2 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2018 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 7-6(10) 6-7(4) 6-3 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Caroline Garcia | Yafan Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |