H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Caroline Wozniacki vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 4-2

Caroline Wozniacki holds a 4–2 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Caroline Wozniacki leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2012 Rome third round 6-4 4-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Caroline Wozniacki
DEN Age 36 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2012* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 6-4 4-0 (ret.) Caroline Wozniacki #8 Match data
Jun 28, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Caroline Wozniacki #9 6-2 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #20 Match data
Oct 25, 2008* Luxembourg WTA 500 QF Hard Caroline Wozniacki #16 6-1 7-6(7) Anabel Medina Garrigues #22 Match data
Sep 25, 2008* Beijing WTA 500 R32 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #27 7-6(3) 6-4 Caroline Wozniacki #17 Match data
Aug 2, 2008* Stockholm WTA 250 QF Hard Caroline Wozniacki #26 6-1 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #30 Match data
Feb 22, 2008* Doha WTA 1000 R16 Hard Caroline Wozniacki #53 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Caroline Wozniacki #289 #1 10,255 2,153 605 269 69.2% 1 6 1 11 10 29
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Caroline Wozniacki Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2005 0–2 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2006 4–4 50.0% #231 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2007 12–15 44.4% #60 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 51–19 72.9% #12 1,909 0 3 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2009 66–25 72.5% #4 1,894 0 6 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2010 63–17 78.8% #1 2,106 0 12 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2011 63–17 78.8% #1 1,987 0 18 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2012 47–20 70.1% #10 1,972 0 20 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2013 41–22 65.1% #10 1,914 0 21 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2014 49–19 72.1% #8 2,010 0 22 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2015 39–23 62.9% #17 1,814 0 23 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2016 30–15 66.7% #19 1,885 0 25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2017 60–22 73.2% #3 1,975 0 27 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2018 36–17 67.9% #3 1,913 1 29 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2019 20–15 57.1% #38 1,835 1 29 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2020 5–2 71.4% #36 1,844 1 29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11
32 2023 4–3 57.1% #249 1,856 1 29 — — — — — — —
33 2024 15–12 55.6% #70 1,840 1 29 — — — — — — —