H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Caroline Wozniacki vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 4-2

Caroline Wozniacki holds a 4–2 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Caroline Wozniacki leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2012 Italian Open round of 32 6-4 4-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Caroline Wozniacki
Denmark Age 36 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main-draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 6-4 4-0 (ret.) Caroline Wozniacki #8 Match data May 17, 2012* R32 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Caroline Wozniacki #9 6-2 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #20 Match data Jun 28, 2009* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Caroline Wozniacki #16 6-1 7-6(7) Anabel Medina Garrigues #22 Match data Oct 25, 2008* QF Luxembourg Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Anabel Medina Garrigues #27 7-6(3) 6-4 Caroline Wozniacki #17 Match data Sep 25, 2008* R32 China Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Caroline Wozniacki #26 6-1 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #30 Match data Aug 2, 2008* QF Stockholm Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Caroline Wozniacki #53 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 Match data Feb 22, 2008* R16 Qatar Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Caroline Wozniacki #289 #1 10,255 2,154 620 275 69.3% 1 6 1 11 11 30
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,834 310 278 52.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Caroline Wozniacki Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2005 0–2 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2006 4–4 50.0% #231 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2007 12–15 44.4% #60 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 53–20 72.6% #12 1,913 0 3 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,495 0 0
18 2009 66–25 72.5% #4 1,898 0 6 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,562 0 1
19 2010 63–17 78.8% #1 2,105 0 12 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2011 63–17 78.8% #1 1,988 0 18 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2012 50–21 70.4% #10 1,975 0 20 2004 25–23 52.1% #39 1,708 0 2
22 2013 41–22 65.1% #10 1,906 0 21 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,744 0 4
23 2014 49–19 72.1% #8 2,014 0 22 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,689 0 6
24 2015 39–23 62.9% #17 1,817 0 23 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,682 0 7
25 2016 34–18 65.4% #19 1,912 0 25 2008 41–25 62.1% #22 1,819 0 8
26 2017 60–22 73.2% #3 2,004 0 27 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2018 41–17 70.7% #3 1,947 1 30 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,567 0 9
28 2019 20–15 57.1% #38 1,845 1 30 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,783 0 11
29 2020 5–2 71.4% #36 1,852 1 30 2012 23–26 46.9% #50 1,618 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,541 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,491 0 11
32 2023 4–3 57.1% #249 1,862 1 30 — — — — — — —
33 2024 16–13 55.2% #70 1,845 1 30 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Caroline Wozniacki Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2006 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 42 13 55 76.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2009 35 18 53 66.0% 23 6 29 79.3% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2010 45 9 54 83.3% 15 6 21 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 40 11 51 78.4% 20 5 25 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — — — — —
21 2012 42 14 56 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2013 34 14 48 70.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2014 42 15 57 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2015 26 17 43 60.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2016 31 14 45 68.9% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2008 21 15 36 58.3% 18 7 25 72.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2017 41 14 55 74.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2009 19 18 37 51.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2018 26 12 38 68.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2010 4 13 17 23.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2019 12 9 21 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2020 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 8 13 21 38.1% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 8 10 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2023 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 447 188 635 70.4% 111 59 170 65.3% 62 28 90 68.9% — — — — — 125 149 274 45.6% 168 99 267 62.9% 15 21 36 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 788/893 of Caroline Wozniacki's and 326/508 of Anabel Medina Garrigues's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Caroline Wozniacki Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2006 3/8 2.7 2.3 65.7% 58.9% 51.0% 43.9% 42.3% 56.6% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 18/27 1.1 3.2 67.3% 56.6% 40.0% 54.4% 45.4% 51.4% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 63/73 2.1 2.1 65.9% 65.6% 50.8% 58.8% 54.4% 60.4% 49.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 86/91 2.0 1.7 68.9% 64.2% 50.0% 52.2% 49.6% 59.7% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 71/80 1.8 1.9 68.9% 65.3% 50.2% 59.5% 50.1% 60.6% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 73/80 1.6 1.6 70.6% 65.6% 51.4% 58.1% 53.0% 61.5% 51.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 60/71 1.8 1.6 66.8% 63.6% 51.4% 59.5% 52.9% 59.4% 47.5% 2004 6/48 1.8 0.7 78.0% 58.3% 59.5% 62.0% 59.9% 58.6% 46.3%
22 2013 56/63 1.5 1.8 69.1% 62.5% 50.3% 59.3% 54.1% 58.9% 47.5% 2005 5/51 2.2 1.8 64.4% 56.8% 36.3% 52.9% 45.1% 49.6% 48.6%
23 2014 61/68 2.3 2.6 69.6% 66.0% 48.0% 58.7% 53.3% 60.4% 48.1% 2006 24/58 0.8 1.8 61.8% 56.1% 49.6% 49.2% 58.3% 53.5% 44.6%
24 2015 51/62 2.0 1.9 69.9% 65.3% 52.6% 50.4% 51.3% 61.5% 46.7% 2007 42/47 1.2 1.7 62.3% 63.3% 47.4% 49.5% 51.9% 57.3% 44.3%
25 2016 44/52 2.1 2.1 67.7% 66.5% 46.3% 57.0% 56.3% 59.9% 47.8% 2008 51/66 1.1 1.0 67.2% 61.0% 52.7% 53.2% 53.7% 58.3% 47.3%
26 2017 76/82 2.6 2.2 67.6% 65.7% 49.4% 56.8% 51.6% 60.2% 47.8% 2009 47/59 1.1 1.7 65.4% 63.4% 45.4% 46.8% 51.9% 56.9% 46.0%
27 2018 50/58 3.0 2.5 64.9% 68.0% 48.4% 52.5% 54.9% 61.2% 48.3% 2010 40/43 1.1 1.8 63.9% 59.5% 46.7% 50.2% 45.9% 54.8% 46.0%
28 2019 35/35 2.8 1.8 65.3% 63.2% 50.1% 51.6% 50.7% 58.5% 44.4% 2011 44/56 0.7 1.0 66.7% 62.3% 49.9% 48.2% 55.5% 58.3% 49.6%
29 2020 7/7 3.1 1.3 70.4% 68.7% 54.5% 63.1% 43.8% 64.8% 49.2% 2012 46/49 1.5 1.3 64.2% 60.7% 46.8% 54.9% 42.5% 55.9% 42.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 19/27 1.9 2.3 63.2% 61.4% 43.9% 45.3% 45.3% 55.3% 44.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 2/4 0.5 2.0 65.9% 56.8% 23.0% 63.9% 25.0% 45.3% 36.3%
32 2023 7/7 2.1 3.0 61.5% 67.5% 47.4% 57.7% 36.6% 59.6% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 27/29 1.8 2.6 64.3% 65.3% 47.6% 55.5% 55.0% 59.1% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 788/895 2.1 2.0 67.9% 65.0% 49.7% 56.4% 52.2% 60.0% 47.9% — 326/588 1.2 1.5 64.9% 61.1% 48.0% 50.5% 50.6% 56.5% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Caroline Wozniacki Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2005 1482 101.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — 0–1 — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2006 1527 119.1 +0.53 +0.91 1.137 52.5% +17 — — 47.1% -0.12 1–0 — — -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 1556 117.2 -2.81 -1.82 0.860 46.7% +15 -35 — 46.0% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 7–1 (88%) 103.2 +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1914 154.8 +4.79 +4.70 1.241 54.7% -5 -303 -228 69.9% +1.69 9–5 (64%) 6–8 (43%) 104.7 -0.96 2000 1495 109.4 — — — — — +46 — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 0–1 — -0.45
18 2009 1899 153.9 +3.97 +4.82 1.208 54.1% -27 -24 -64 69.4% +1.47 15–8 (65%) 11–7 (61%) 106.6 -0.77 2001 1563 117.3 — — — — -85 +93 — 48.8% +0.08 4–10 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 93.0 +0.66
19 2010 2105 166.0 +4.94 +4.76 1.219 54.3% +27 -204 -284 72.4% +1.70 18–4 (82%) 8–2 (80%) 113.4 +1.46 2002 1688 129.0 — — — — -48 — — 75.0% +1.87 2–0 0–1 — +0.26
20 2011 1988 162.1 +5.76 +7.01 1.328 56.0% +52 -9 -153 74.7% +1.90 11–7 (61%) 10–5 (67%) 101.2 +1.97 2003 1613 108.3 — — — — 0 +20 — 49.2% +0.02 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 +1.71
21 2012 1976 156.2 +3.80 +4.12 1.171 53.6% +42 -42 -144 66.9% +1.29 15–9 (63%) 11–8 (58%) 100.8 +0.75 2004 1708 129.8 +1.41 +0.60 1.118 51.8% -57 +9 -121 53.7% +0.07 6–8 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 98.9 -1.46
22 2013 1906 152.3 +3.39 +3.53 1.156 53.3% +82 -137 -61 61.0% +1.06 9–9 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 92.0 +3.21 2005 1745 135.2 -1.51 +1.69 0.965 49.2% -99 +158 -209 53.6% +0.26 6–6 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.7 -2.02
23 2014 2014 163.0 +4.24 +5.25 1.216 54.2% +24 -280 -133 64.9% +1.45 16–6 (73%) 5–10 (33%) 100.3 -0.30 2006 1689 128.8 -1.72 -0.23 0.958 49.1% -75 +209 -104 55.6% +0.38 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 +2.64
24 2015 1818 153.2 +3.21 +4.72 1.211 54.0% +6 -9 +74 62.6% +1.23 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.2 -0.90 2007 1682 135.1 +0.95 +0.79 1.039 50.5% -106 +315 — 53.6% +0.32 7–11 (39%) 8–3 (73%) 98.9 +0.01
25 2016 1912 146.8 +3.41 +3.91 1.191 53.8% +27 — -117 65.2% +1.25 8–7 (53%) 3–5 (38%) 96.7 -0.32 2008 1820 137.4 +2.98 +3.19 1.133 52.6% -59 +96 -278 58.5% +0.61 11–11 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 97.9 -0.46
26 2017 2004 161.0 +3.91 +4.92 1.202 54.0% +52 -146 -103 68.5% +1.56 17–8 (68%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 +0.13 2009 1684 126.3 +0.93 +1.02 1.069 51.3% -23 +170 -48 52.7% +0.20 11–6 (65%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 +2.67
27 2018 1947 156.8 +4.39 +5.24 1.245 54.7% +6 -64 +24 67.7% +1.47 12–6 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 101.2 +0.11 2010 1568 122.5 -1.00 +1.31 1.018 50.4% -21 +188 — 44.7% -0.10 4–8 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.63
28 2019 1845 144.8 +1.89 +0.99 1.069 51.3% +47 -6 +118 60.8% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 5–2 (71%) 96.0 +0.87 2011 1783 138.0 +2.59 +4.74 1.189 53.8% -112 +101 — 61.8% +0.86 2–8 (20%) 6–7 (46%) 94.4 -1.92
29 2020 1853 131.5 +2.36 +2.51 1.397 56.9% +35 — — 70.6% +1.71 1–2 (33%) — — +0.18 2012 1619 120.1 +0.13 -0.99 0.970 49.5% -31 +157 -55 49.1% +0.03 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 97.5 +1.56
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1542 118.6 -0.14 +0.99 1.001 49.5% -27 +153 -29 38.7% -0.87 2–10 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 91.4 -1.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1491 90.1 -2.24 -1.41 0.663 41.1% — — — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — +0.24
32 2023 1863 134.9 +2.02 +2.05 1.110 51.8% +58 — — 56.3% +0.56 1–1 1–0 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1845 140.8 +1.93 +2.73 1.145 53.0% +44 -42 +224 58.1% +0.77 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2154 160.9 +3.83 +4.42 1.199 53.9% +28 -90 -57 66.3% +1.33 153–96 (61%) 94–79 (54%) 104.3 +0.57 — 1834 132.6 +0.82 +1.48 1.053 51.0% -62 +135 -114 52.6% +0.21 79–99 (44%) 54–55 (50%) 94.1 +0.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.