H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Caroline Wozniacki vs Jill Craybas H2H: 2-0
Caroline Wozniacki holds a 2–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Caroline Wozniacki leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Wozniacki won the 2009 Roland Garros second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-1 6-4 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2009* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-4 7-5 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Wozniacki | Jill Craybas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |