H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Caroline Wozniacki vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-1
Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Caroline Wozniacki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2008 Memphis quarterfinal 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2008* | Memphis | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-0 6-2 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Wozniacki | Lindsay Davenport | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 | 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 | 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 |
| 23 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 | 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 |
| 24 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 |
| 25 | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 | 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 |
| 26 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 | 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 |
| 27 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 | 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 |
| 28 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 | 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 |
| 29 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 | 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 | 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 |
| 33 | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |