H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Caroline Wozniacki vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-2
Martina Hingis holds a 2–0 lead over Caroline Wozniacki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2007 Indian Wells second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2007* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-3 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2006* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-2 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Wozniacki | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |
| 27 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |