H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Caroline Wozniacki vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 2-0
Caroline Wozniacki holds a 2–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Caroline Wozniacki leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Wozniacki won the 2016 Monterrey fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2016* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-4 6-4 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2015* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Caroline Wozniacki | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Wozniacki | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |