H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Caroline Wozniacki vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 0-1
Nathalie Dechy holds a 1–0 lead over Caroline Wozniacki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2007 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-7(3) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Nathalie Dechy | 6-2 6-7(3) 6-0 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Wozniacki | Nathalie Dechy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |