H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Caroline Wozniacki vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-0

Caroline Wozniacki holds a 1–0 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Caroline Wozniacki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Wozniacki won the 2008 Japan Women's Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Caroline Wozniacki
Denmark Age 36 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Caroline Wozniacki #16 6-4 6-1 Tamarine Tanasugarn #37 Match data Oct 4, 2008* QF Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Caroline Wozniacki #289 #1 10,255 2,154 620 275 69.3% 1 6 1 11 11 30
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Caroline Wozniacki Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2005 0–2 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2006 4–4 50.0% #231 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2007 12–15 44.4% #60 1,555 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 2008 53–20 72.6% #12 1,913 0 3 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 2009 66–25 72.5% #4 1,898 0 6 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 2010 63–17 78.8% #1 2,105 0 12 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 2011 63–17 78.8% #1 1,988 0 18 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2012 50–21 70.4% #10 1,975 0 20 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2013 41–22 65.1% #10 1,906 0 21 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 2014 49–19 72.1% #8 2,014 0 22 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 2015 39–23 62.9% #17 1,817 0 23 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 2016 34–18 65.4% #19 1,912 0 25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2017 60–22 73.2% #3 2,004 0 27 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2018 41–17 70.7% #3 1,947 1 30 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 2019 20–15 57.1% #38 1,845 1 30 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 2020 5–2 71.4% #36 1,852 1 30 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 2023 4–3 57.1% #249 1,862 1 30 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3
33 2024 16–13 55.2% #70 1,845 1 30 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Caroline Wozniacki Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2006 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 42 13 55 76.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 35 18 53 66.0% 23 6 29 79.3% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 45 9 54 83.3% 15 6 21 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2011 40 11 51 78.4% 20 5 25 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2012 42 14 56 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2013 34 14 48 70.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 2014 42 15 57 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2015 26 17 43 60.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2016 31 14 45 68.9% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2017 41 14 55 74.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2018 26 12 38 68.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2019 12 9 21 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2020 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
32 2023 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 2024 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 447 188 635 70.4% 111 59 170 65.3% 62 28 90 68.9% — — — — — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 788/893 of Caroline Wozniacki's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Caroline Wozniacki Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2006 3/8 2.7 2.3 65.7% 58.9% 51.0% 43.9% 42.3% 56.6% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 18/27 1.1 3.2 67.3% 56.6% 40.0% 54.4% 45.4% 51.4% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 63/73 2.1 2.1 65.9% 65.6% 50.8% 58.8% 54.4% 60.4% 49.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 86/91 2.0 1.7 68.9% 64.2% 50.0% 52.2% 49.6% 59.7% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 71/80 1.8 1.9 68.9% 65.3% 50.2% 59.5% 50.1% 60.6% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 73/80 1.6 1.6 70.6% 65.6% 51.4% 58.1% 53.0% 61.5% 51.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 60/71 1.8 1.6 66.8% 63.6% 51.4% 59.5% 52.9% 59.4% 47.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 56/63 1.5 1.8 69.1% 62.5% 50.3% 59.3% 54.1% 58.9% 47.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2014 61/68 2.3 2.6 69.6% 66.0% 48.0% 58.7% 53.3% 60.4% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 51/62 2.0 1.9 69.9% 65.3% 52.6% 50.4% 51.3% 61.5% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2016 44/52 2.1 2.1 67.7% 66.5% 46.3% 57.0% 56.3% 59.9% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 76/82 2.6 2.2 67.6% 65.7% 49.4% 56.8% 51.6% 60.2% 47.8% 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 2018 50/58 3.0 2.5 64.9% 68.0% 48.4% 52.5% 54.9% 61.2% 48.3% 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 2019 35/35 2.8 1.8 65.3% 63.2% 50.1% 51.6% 50.7% 58.5% 44.4% 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 2020 7/7 3.1 1.3 70.4% 68.7% 54.5% 63.1% 43.8% 64.8% 49.2% 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 2023 7/7 2.1 3.0 61.5% 67.5% 47.4% 57.7% 36.6% 59.6% 44.8% 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 2024 27/29 1.8 2.6 64.3% 65.3% 47.6% 55.5% 55.0% 59.1% 46.8% 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
Career — 788/895 2.1 2.0 67.9% 65.0% 49.7% 56.4% 52.2% 60.0% 47.9% — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Caroline Wozniacki Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2005 1482 101.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — 0–1 — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2006 1527 119.1 +0.53 +0.91 1.137 52.5% +17 — — 47.1% -0.12 1–0 — — -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 1556 117.2 -2.81 -1.82 0.860 46.7% +15 -35 — 46.0% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 7–1 (88%) 103.2 +0.40 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
17 2008 1914 154.8 +4.79 +4.70 1.241 54.7% -5 -303 -228 69.9% +1.69 9–5 (64%) 6–8 (43%) 104.7 -0.96 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06
18 2009 1899 153.9 +3.97 +4.82 1.208 54.1% -27 -24 -64 69.4% +1.47 15–8 (65%) 11–7 (61%) 106.6 -0.77 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28
19 2010 2105 166.0 +4.94 +4.76 1.219 54.3% +27 -204 -284 72.4% +1.70 18–4 (82%) 8–2 (80%) 113.4 +1.46 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66
20 2011 1988 162.1 +5.76 +7.01 1.328 56.0% +52 -9 -153 74.7% +1.90 11–7 (61%) 10–5 (67%) 101.2 +1.97 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65
21 2012 1976 156.2 +3.80 +4.12 1.171 53.6% +42 -42 -144 66.9% +1.29 15–9 (63%) 11–8 (58%) 100.8 +0.75 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91
22 2013 1906 152.3 +3.39 +3.53 1.156 53.3% +82 -137 -61 61.0% +1.06 9–9 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 92.0 +3.21 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52
23 2014 2014 163.0 +4.24 +5.25 1.216 54.2% +24 -280 -133 64.9% +1.45 16–6 (73%) 5–10 (33%) 100.3 -0.30 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30
24 2015 1818 153.2 +3.21 +4.72 1.211 54.0% +6 -9 +74 62.6% +1.23 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.2 -0.90 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28
25 2016 1912 146.8 +3.41 +3.91 1.191 53.8% +27 — -117 65.2% +1.25 8–7 (53%) 3–5 (38%) 96.7 -0.32 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48
26 2017 2004 161.0 +3.91 +4.92 1.202 54.0% +52 -146 -103 68.5% +1.56 17–8 (68%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 +0.13 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78
27 2018 1947 156.8 +4.39 +5.24 1.245 54.7% +6 -64 +24 67.7% +1.47 12–6 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 101.2 +0.11 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55
28 2019 1845 144.8 +1.89 +0.99 1.069 51.3% +47 -6 +118 60.8% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 5–2 (71%) 96.0 +0.87 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91
29 2020 1853 131.5 +2.36 +2.51 1.397 56.9% +35 — — 70.6% +1.71 1–2 (33%) — — +0.18 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05
32 2023 1863 134.9 +2.02 +2.05 1.110 51.8% +58 — — 56.3% +0.56 1–1 1–0 — -0.17 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13
33 2024 1845 140.8 +1.93 +2.73 1.145 53.0% +44 -42 +224 58.1% +0.77 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 +0.15 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05
Career — 2154 160.9 +3.83 +4.42 1.199 53.9% +28 -90 -57 66.3% +1.33 153–96 (61%) 94–79 (54%) 104.3 +0.57 — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.