H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Casey Dellacqua vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-0

Casey Dellacqua holds a 1–0 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2008 Australian Open third round 3-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Casey Dellacqua #78 3-6 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #18 Match data Jan 20, 2008* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,757 80 106 43.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Casey Dellacqua Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,489 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,472 0 0 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,474 0 0 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,501 0 0 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,501 0 0 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2008 18–17 51.4% #53 1,629 0 0 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,597 0 0 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,563 0 0 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,541 0 0 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,592 0 0 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,490 0 0 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,741 0 0 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25
30 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Casey Dellacqua Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2006 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2008 11 9 20 55.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2009 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2010 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2013 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2014 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
30 2015 3 9 12 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 53 74 127 41.7% 10 16 26 38.5% 17 16 33 51.5% — — — — — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 163/185 of Casey Dellacqua's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Casey Dellacqua Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 1/2 2.0 6.0 53.4% 56.4% 41.2% 66.7% 37.5% 49.3% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1/3 1.0 7.0 54.3% 63.2% 50.0% 33.3% 42.9% 57.1% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1/7 1.0 7.0 47.4% 55.6% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0% 47.4% 26.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 17/18 1.8 3.6 60.5% 60.6% 44.5% 42.3% 53.2% 54.1% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 31/35 2.9 4.3 58.6% 63.1% 44.2% 54.4% 49.5% 55.4% 45.2% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2009 3/3 1.0 5.3 52.8% 46.5% 36.2% 28.4% 13.9% 42.2% 38.4% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2010 7/7 1.0 3.4 53.5% 55.2% 40.5% 37.9% 37.3% 48.1% 42.3% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2011 6/8 2.0 4.5 64.2% 60.4% 45.9% 63.2% 81.9% 55.0% 44.2% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2012 22/24 1.0 3.8 62.7% 59.3% 39.5% 49.5% 47.4% 51.8% 43.4% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2013 9/9 0.9 3.0 61.8% 57.4% 45.2% 49.0% 53.9% 52.6% 33.7% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 2014 41/44 1.7 3.0 59.5% 62.2% 49.4% 54.3% 48.9% 56.9% 43.5% 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
30 2015 24/25 2.0 3.3 62.4% 61.9% 50.1% 52.0% 50.0% 57.4% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 163/186 1.8 3.6 60.1% 60.8% 45.6% 50.9% 49.4% 54.6% 42.6% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Casey Dellacqua Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06
18 2003 1489 100.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.02 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59
19 2004 1473 96.4 -3.43 -1.30 0.865 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.14 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67
20 2005 1475 101.7 -1.70 -1.14 0.860 46.6% +3 — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 0–1 — -0.05 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71
21 2006 1501 113.4 -0.08 -1.23 0.504 37.7% -2 — — 37.5% -1.00 2–0 1–1 — -0.22 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74
22 2007 1502 122.1 -1.56 -0.63 0.973 49.3% +17 — +91 43.2% -0.18 1–7 (13%) — — -0.01 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13
23 2008 1630 126.8 -0.29 +1.02 1.014 50.2% +9 -98 -24 47.5% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 103.0 +0.09 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28
24 2009 1598 101.9 -2.95 -1.13 0.664 40.6% +4 — — 0.0% -3.67 — 0–1 — -0.17 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48
25 2010 1563 103.6 -3.53 -0.93 0.814 45.4% +23 — — 31.3% -1.50 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.55 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83
26 2011 1541 104.0 -1.59 -2.06 0.982 49.7% — -17 — 42.1% -0.26 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.43 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85
27 2012 1593 122.1 -1.70 -0.55 0.901 47.8% -3 — +45 42.3% -0.52 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.51 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 2013 1490 95.2 -2.07 -4.32 0.712 44.0% +4 — — 15.8% -2.16 0–1 0–2 — +1.12 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52
29 2014 1742 139.6 +0.67 +0.45 1.011 50.3% -28 -176 -39 55.2% +0.23 13–6 (68%) 4–5 (44%) 108.7 +0.21 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60
30 2015 1629 117.9 -0.10 -0.71 0.929 48.4% -22 -90 +90 43.1% -0.65 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1613 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1758 127.4 -0.70 -0.33 0.939 48.7% -5 -99 +29 43.8% -0.46 31–34 (48%) 14–22 (39%) 100.0 +0.60 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.