H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Casey Dellacqua vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 0-2

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 2–0 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2013 Birmingham second round 6-1 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 12, 2013* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Daniela Hantuchova #60 6-1 7-6(1) Casey Dellacqua #139 Match data
Jan 21, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #21 7-6(11) 6-4 Casey Dellacqua #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,761 79 105 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Casey Dellacqua Daniela Hantuchova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,490 0 0 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,473 0 0 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1
20 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,475 0 0 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1
21 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,502 0 0 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1
22 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,502 0 0 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1
23 2008 17–16 51.5% #53 1,618 0 0 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,587 0 0 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3
25 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,555 0 0 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3
26 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,535 0 0 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3
27 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,584 0 0 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3
28 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,484 0 0 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4
29 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,745 0 0 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5
30 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,629 0 0 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7