H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Casey Dellacqua vs Shahar Peer H2H: 1-0
Casey Dellacqua holds a 1–0 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2011 Brussels third round 6-1 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 41
Left-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2011* | Brussels | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Casey Dellacqua | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,761 | 79 | 105 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casey Dellacqua | Shahar Peer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #53 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |