H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Casey Dellacqua vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 1-0

Casey Dellacqua holds a 1–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2008 New Haven third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 21, 2008* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Casey Dellacqua #44 6-3 6-1 Virginie Razzano #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,761 79 105 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Casey Dellacqua Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,490 0 0 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,473 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,475 0 0 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,502 0 0 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,502 0 0 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2008 17–16 51.5% #53 1,618 0 0 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,587 0 0 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,555 0 0 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,535 0 0 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,584 0 0 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,484 0 0 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,745 0 0 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,629 0 0 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2