H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan and Kathy Horvath are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1989 Brisbane third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 1989* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-3 6-0 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1986* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kathy Horvath | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |