H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 2-0
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1986 Boca Raton third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1986* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 6-0 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| Feb 10, 1983* | Indianapolis Indoors | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 6-1 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |