H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Catherine Bellis vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-1

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Bellis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2016 Stanford quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Bellis
USA Age 27 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 23, 2016* Stanford WTA 500 QF Hard Venus Williams #7 6-4 6-1 Catherine Bellis #203 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Catherine Bellis #337 #35 1,445 1,828 40 36 52.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Bellis Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 2014 1–1 50.0% #254 1,515 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2015 2–2 50.0% #233 1,538 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2016 6–4 60.0% #75 1,671 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2017 17–15 53.1% #46 1,717 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2018 7–7 50.0% #130 1,792 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 — — — — — — — 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2020 7–7 50.0% #133 1,763 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 — — — — — — — 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 — — — — — — — 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 — — — — — — — 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 — — — — — — — 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 — — — — — — — 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 — — — — — — — 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 — — — — — — — 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 — — — — — — — 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47