H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Catherine Bellis vs Veronica Cepede Royg H2H: 1-0

Catherine Bellis holds a 1–0 lead over Veronica Cepede Royg in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catherine Bellis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catherine Bellis won the 2017 Stanford second round 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Bellis
United States Age 27 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Veronica Cepede Royg
Paraguay Age 34 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catherine Bellis #44 7-6(3) 6-2 Veronica Cepede Royg #85 Match data Aug 4, 2017* R16 Stanford Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Catherine Bellis #337 #35 1,445 1,832 40 36 52.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Veronica Cepede Royg #917 #73 820 1,690 26 44 37.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Bellis Veronica Cepede Royg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2014 1–1 50.0% #254 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2015 2–2 50.0% #233 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2016 6–4 60.0% #75 1,675 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2017 17–15 53.1% #46 1,721 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2018 7–7 50.0% #130 1,797 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #195 1,491 0 0
21 2020 7–7 50.0% #133 1,767 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — 2014 1–3 25.0% #164 1,467 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2015 3–3 50.0% #141 1,486 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2016 6–9 40.0% #129 1,521 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2017 12–14 46.2% #75 1,623 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2018 4–13 23.5% #138 1,560 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #194 1,490 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Catherine Bellis Veronica Cepede Royg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2014 1515 110.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.67 1–1 — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2015 1539 120.5 +2.12 -1.12 0.868 47.4% +18 — — 50.0% +0.38 — 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2016 1675 116.5 -1.00 +2.02 0.975 49.2% +13 — — 54.2% +0.12 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2017 1721 133.7 -0.05 -0.02 0.951 49.2% -33 -75 -81 51.9% -0.08 7–6 (54%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2018 1798 144.4 +0.45 +1.52 1.004 50.2% -13 — — 48.3% -0.45 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.1 -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2019 1789 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1492 98.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.05
21 2020 1767 127.9 -1.33 +1.66 0.990 49.8% +18 — — 48.5% -0.27 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 100.9 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1468 95.3 -1.36 -1.34 0.778 44.5% — +65 — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.31
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1487 110.2 +0.96 +1.62 1.153 53.1% — +51 — 57.1% +0.79 0–2 0–1 — +0.36
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1521 115.2 -0.05 -0.12 1.016 50.2% -24 -22 +151 41.7% -0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +0.56
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1623 112.8 -1.80 +0.06 0.944 48.7% -64 0 +49 42.9% -0.59 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 106.3 +0.14
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1561 120.5 -0.88 -1.25 0.909 48.2% +21 +25 — 34.1% -1.00 1–6 (14%) 3–1 (75%) 96.7 -0.31
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1551 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1516 95.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1490 101.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.04
Career — 1832 139.7 -0.21 +0.81 0.968 49.4% -5 -75 -81 50.8% -0.10 15–12 (56%) 11–9 (55%) 104.2 -1.57 — 1691 114.4 -0.91 -0.24 0.959 49.1% -29 +20 +93 40.5% -0.62 12–18 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 99.7 +1.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.