H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Catherine Suire vs Ivanna Madruga H2H: 0-1
Ivanna Madruga holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Suire in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivanna Madruga leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivanna Madruga won the 1984 Lugano fourth round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 65
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1984* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ivanna Madruga | 6-0 6-3 | Catherine Suire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Suire | #513 | #52 | 13 | 1,692 | 77 | 128 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ivanna Madruga | — | — | — | 1,916 | 131 | 88 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Suire | Ivanna Madruga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 25–12 | 67.6% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #84 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #135 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #124 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #139 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #213 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |