H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Catherine Suire vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 0-1

Kathy Horvath holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Suire in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathy Horvath leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1983 Nashville round of 16 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Suire
FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kathy Horvath
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathy Horvath 6-4 6-3 Catherine Suire Match data Mar 4, 1983* R16 Nashville WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Catherine Suire #513 #52 13 1,672 79 129 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kathy Horvath #283 #10 24 1,975 187 155 54.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Suire Kathy Horvath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1980 6–7 46.2% — 1,563 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1981 34–23 59.6% — 1,858 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 1982 15–17 46.9% — 1,775 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 1983 39–18 68.4% — 1,930 0 4
18 — — — — — — — 1984 25–19 56.8% #29 1,799 0 4
19 — — — — — — — 1985 23–16 59.0% #34 1,775 0 6
20 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,488 0 0 1986 16–15 51.6% #47 1,739 0 6
21 1981 5–6 45.5% — 1,519 0 0 1987 18–15 54.5% #37 1,714 0 7
22 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,500 0 0 1988 9–15 37.5% #85 1,602 0 7
23 1983 11–12 47.8% — 1,627 0 0 1989 2–8 20.0% #224 1,529 0 7
24 1984 7–14 33.3% #115 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1985 6–11 35.3% #104 1,604 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1986 11–16 40.7% #84 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1987 8–11 42.1% #135 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1988 10–16 38.5% #124 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1989 6–11 35.3% #139 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1990 3–7 30.0% #189 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1991 8–10 44.4% #115 1,592 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1992 3–10 23.1% #213 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1993 0–2 0.0% #244 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Catherine Suire Kathy Horvath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 12 11 23 52.2%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1981 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 6 6 12 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 31 45 76 40.8% 18 35 53 34.0% 20 29 49 40.8% 7 14 21 33.3% — 45 50 95 47.4% 111 67 178 62.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 28 32 60 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Catherine Suire Kathy Horvath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1497 113.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1563 110.2 — — — — +45 -63 — 43.3% -0.37 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.0 -0.09
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1859 146.5 — — — — -40 -79 — 56.3% +0.44 11–7 (61%) 7–5 (58%) 108.4 +0.14
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1775 143.3 — — — — -40 +62 — 52.9% +0.46 1–7 (13%) 2–3 (40%) 92.6 -4.36
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1931 149.2 — — — — -65 +55 — 63.7% +0.74 9–3 (75%) 11–6 (65%) 109.3 +1.14
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1799 146.8 — — — — -83 +206 — 56.1% +0.43 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 94.7 +0.34
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1776 138.0 — — — — -112 +220 — 55.8% +0.24 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -0.67
20 1980 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.31 1986 1740 130.3 — — — — -73 +184 -140 48.6% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 104.3 -1.58
21 1981 1519 113.9 — — — — — +61 — 48.0% -0.12 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.38 1987 1714 125.9 — — — — -43 +149 — 54.1% +0.18 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +3.16
22 1982 1501 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.21 1988 1603 116.3 — — — — +7 +113 — 41.5% -0.64 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.3 +0.35
23 1983 1628 116.8 — — — — -25 -84 +53 44.4% -0.13 6–2 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 104.7 +0.90 1989 1530 101.0 — — — — +17 — — 33.3% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.4 +0.29
24 1984 1605 119.5 — — — — -55 -6 +55 35.4% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1985 1604 117.1 — — — — -49 -21 +14 34.2% -1.29 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 1581 108.8 — — — — -11 -33 +17 39.1% -0.69 7–5 (58%) 2–6 (25%) 98.7 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1987 1584 113.3 — — — — -31 -2 — 43.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.5 +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1988 1588 119.2 — — — — +7 -54 -33 38.1% -0.76 7–4 (64%) 2–3 (40%) 103.7 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 1577 115.4 — — — — +58 -84 -19 39.0% -1.41 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1547 110.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.0% -1.10 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1592 120.8 — — — — -27 — +66 46.3% -0.32 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1534 103.0 — — — — -3 — +72 25.8% -1.68 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 100.9 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1516 103.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 1–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1672 120.0 — — — — -6 -24 +32 38.5% -0.86 39–32 (55%) 20–30 (40%) 101.6 +0.70 — 1976 144.0 — — — — -49 +106 -140 53.7% +0.21 49–40 (55%) 39–36 (52%) 103.2 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.