H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catherine Suire vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 2-1
Catherine Suire holds a 2–1 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Catherine Suire leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catherine Suire won the 1987 Phoenix third round 5-7 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 69
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1987* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Catherine Suire | 5-7 7-5 7-5 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Catherine Suire | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1981* | Nantes | WTA 250 | R16 | — | Patricia Medrado | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Catherine Suire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Suire | #513 | #52 | 13 | 1,692 | 77 | 128 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Suire | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #84 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #135 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #124 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1989 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #139 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 1992 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #213 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |