H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Catherine Tanvier vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 0-4
Kathy Horvath holds a 4–0 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kathy Horvath leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1984 Berlin semifinal 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1984* | Berlin | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 6-3 7-5 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1984* | Orlando | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 6-4 6-2 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
| May 4, 1983* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 6-3 6-0 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1982* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 7-5 6-2 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catherine Tanvier | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |