H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Cecilia Dahlman vs Sabrina Goles H2H: 0-1

Sabrina Goles holds a 1–0 lead over Cecilia Dahlman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabrina Goles leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabrina Goles won the 1988 Nice round of 32 6-4 6-7 6-1.

SWE Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
YUG Age 61 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sabrina Goles #46 6-4 6-7 6-1 Cecilia Dahlman #282 Match data Jul 14, 1988* R32 Nice WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cecilia Dahlman #405 #63 17 1,673 38 63 37.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sabrina Goles #379 #27 25 1,843 114 119 48.9% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cecilia Dahlman Sabrina Goles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 0–1 0.0% #297 1,482 0 0
18 1983 2–4 33.3% 1,508 0 0
19 1988 2–5 28.6% #165 1,478 0 0 1984 18–15 54.5% #55 1,700 0 0
20 1989 9–9 50.0% #94 1,585 0 1 1985 21–20 51.2% #29 1,691 0 0
21 1990 16–20 44.4% #82 1,639 0 2 1986 24–19 55.8% #30 1,780 0 0
22 1991 6–18 25.0% #189 1,490 0 2 1987 15–18 45.5% #64 1,711 0 1
23 1992 2–4 33.3% #123 1,497 0 2 1988 21–18 53.8% #59 1,715 0 1
24 1993 3–6 33.3% #192 1,512 0 2 1989 11–17 39.3% #105 1,624 0 1
25 1990 2–8 20.0% #205 1,548 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cecilia Dahlman Sabrina Goles
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 15 7 22 68.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 10 7 17 58.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 8 5 13 61.5% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
22 1991 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 4 7 11 36.4% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 8 6 14 57.1% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
Career 6 18 24 25.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 35 37 72 48.6% 71 61 132 53.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 7 15 22 31.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cecilia Dahlman Sabrina Goles
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1985 1482 96.1 0.0% -2.50 +0.21
18 1983 1509 109.0 +51 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 +0.36
19 1988 1478 107.9 +33 38.9% -0.72 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.25 1984 1701 138.5 -131 +85 53.8% +0.38 6–8 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.72
20 1989 1586 124.1 -77 +74 47.6% -0.36 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.9 +1.53 1985 1692 134.6 -8 +31 51.6% +0.16 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 -1.00
21 1990 1640 129.0 -81 +22 -22 46.3% -0.49 3–5 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 +0.28 1986 1780 140.5 -48 +31 54.5% +0.39 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 100.8 -3.16
22 1991 1490 103.6 +47 +73 +72 26.5% -1.57 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.0 +1.03 1987 1711 126.3 -39 +76 45.9% -0.46 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.1 -0.47
23 1992 1497 105.9 +33 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.33 1988 1716 134.6 -30 +39 51.7% +0.18 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 99.8 -1.64
24 1993 1513 115.6 +90 35.0% -1.05 1–1 0–3 (0%) -0.48 1989 1625 125.2 +45 +49 39.1% -0.50 5–5 (50%) 0–5 (0%) 95.0 -0.09
25 1990 1549 103.7 +46 19.0% -2.24 1–2 (33%) -0.04
Career 1673 122.0 -16 +52 +9 39.8% -0.82 12–16 (43%) 13–9 (59%) 101.7 +3.18 1843 137.8 -34 +51 48.6% -0.04 35–40 (47%) 18–24 (43%) 93.6 -2.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.