H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cecilia Martinez vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 1-1
Cecilia Martinez and Raquel Giscafre are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raquel Giscafre leads 1–0 on clay, while Cecilia Martinez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Raquel Giscafre won the 1973 Rome second round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 1973* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Raquel Giscafre | (w/o) | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1972* | Manchester | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Cecilia Martinez | 6-3 6-4 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecilia Martinez | — | — | — | 1,710 | 121 | 157 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecilia Martinez | Raquel Giscafre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1971 | 12–25 | 32.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1972 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1973 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1974 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1975 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 |