H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Pam Shriver H2H: 2-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–1 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on carpet, while Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1996 Oklahoma third round 6-7 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 23, 1996* Oklahoma WTA 250 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #10 6-7 6-3 7-5 Pam Shriver #130 Match data
Feb 10, 1995* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Chanda Rubin #28 6-4 6-1 Pam Shriver #91 Match data
Jun 17, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Pam Shriver #31 6-0 6-2 Chanda Rubin #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 — — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24