H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Paola Suarez H2H: 2-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–1 lead over Paola Suarez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2003 Madrid quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Paola Suarez
ARG Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 24, 2003* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Chanda Rubin #8 6-2 6-4 Paola Suarez #30 Match data
Aug 16, 2000* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Chanda Rubin #17 6-7(5) 6-2 6-2 Paola Suarez #37 Match data
May 23, 1999* Madrid WTA 1000 SF Clay Paola Suarez #109 7-5 2-6 6-1 Chanda Rubin #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Paola Suarez #525 #9 2,081 1,916 223 180 55.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Paola Suarez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% #197 1,519 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1994 5–8 38.5% #114 1,536 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1995 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1996 12–11 52.2% #62 1,618 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1997 6–16 27.3% #118 1,556 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1998 10–9 52.6% #80 1,535 0 1
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1999 12–12 50.0% #72 1,597 0 1
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 2000 27–22 55.1% #36 1,677 0 1
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 2001 27–15 64.3% #27 1,736 0 2
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 2002 30–23 56.6% #27 1,697 0 2
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2003 37–22 62.7% #14 1,859 0 3
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 2004 37–17 68.5% #16 1,804 0 4
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 2005 3–7 30.0% #238 1,712 0 4
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 2006 10–9 52.6% #178 1,699 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2007 3–2 60.0% #300 1,689 0 4