H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Chanelle Scheepers vs Akgul Amanmuradova H2H: 1-2
Akgul Amanmuradova holds a 2–1 lead over Chanelle Scheepers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Akgul Amanmuradova leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Chanelle Scheepers leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Akgul Amanmuradova won the 2011 Pattaya fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 42
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2011* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Akgul Amanmuradova | 6-2 6-4 | Chanelle Scheepers | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Akgul Amanmuradova | 6-3 6-4 | Chanelle Scheepers | Match data |
| May 29, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Chanelle Scheepers | 6-3 6-3 | Akgul Amanmuradova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanelle Scheepers | #429 | #37 | 1,505 | 1,725 | 87 | 108 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Akgul Amanmuradova | #1,097 | #50 | 1,031 | 1,631 | 61 | 101 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chanelle Scheepers | Akgul Amanmuradova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #607 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #197 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #114 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #227 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #77 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #424 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #459 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |