H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Chanelle Scheepers vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 1-0
Chanelle Scheepers holds a 1–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanelle Scheepers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanelle Scheepers won the 2012 Miami second round 1-6 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2012* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Chanelle Scheepers | 1-6 6-4 6-0 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanelle Scheepers | #429 | #37 | 1,505 | 1,725 | 87 | 108 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,852 | 310 | 275 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chanelle Scheepers | Anabel Medina Garrigues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2009 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2011 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,565 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2013 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #77 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,553 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #424 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,501 | 0 | 11 |