H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Chanelle Scheepers vs Arantxa Parra Santonja H2H: 1-0
Chanelle Scheepers holds a 1–0 lead over Arantxa Parra Santonja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanelle Scheepers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanelle Scheepers won the 2009 Guangzhou third round 7-6(12) 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2009* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Chanelle Scheepers | 7-6(12) 5-7 6-3 | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanelle Scheepers | #429 | #37 | 1,505 | 1,725 | 87 | 108 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Arantxa Parra Santonja | #858 | #46 | 1,231 | 1,625 | 71 | 120 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chanelle Scheepers | Arantxa Parra Santonja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #109 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #175 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #77 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #424 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |