H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Chanelle Scheepers vs Kimiko Date H2H: 0-2

Kimiko Date holds a 2–0 lead over Chanelle Scheepers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 2013 Miami round of 128 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanelle Scheepers
RSA Age 42 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kimiko Date #78 6-2 6-0 Chanelle Scheepers #61 Match data Mar 19, 2013* R128 Miami WTA 1000 Hard
Kimiko Date #77 7-5 6-1 Chanelle Scheepers #64 Match data Jan 31, 2013* R32 Pattaya WTA 250 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanelle Scheepers #429 #37 1,505 1,724 87 108 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanelle Scheepers Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 2003 1–1 50.0% #299 1,503 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2008 0–2 0.0% #187 1,485 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5
25 2009 4–8 33.3% #127 1,484 0 0 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7
26 2010 7–9 43.8% #103 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2011 20–19 51.3% #38 1,657 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2012 24–26 48.0% #60 1,678 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2013 15–21 41.7% #80 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2014 15–17 46.9% #77 1,619 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2015 1–5 16.7% #424 1,568 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanelle Scheepers Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2009 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2010 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 16 11 27 59.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 5 13 18 27.8% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 49 66 115 42.6% 34 33 67 50.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanelle Scheepers Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06
19 2003 1504 97.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 +0.14 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12
24 2008 1485 92.0 +0.92 -0.21 0.610 39.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — 0–1 +0.01 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54
25 2009 1485 101.3 -2.96 -2.55 0.773 44.9% +7 — — 36.7% -1.33 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) -0.10 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14
26 2010 1524 115.7 -1.51 +0.20 0.939 48.8% -21 +52 — 43.2% -0.27 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1657 122.4 -2.12 +1.22 0.962 49.0% +14 -94 — 47.9% -0.13 11–5 (69%) 6–3 (67%) +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1678 136.9 -2.13 +2.84 0.974 49.4% +14 -66 -142 48.7% -0.06 6–11 (35%) 4–4 (50%) -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1572 114.1 -3.06 +0.92 0.945 48.7% -12 +86 — 41.5% -0.54 6–4 (60%) 1–5 (17%) +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1620 124.9 -2.98 +1.97 0.959 49.1% -94 +101 — 46.1% -0.13 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1569 103.8 -0.95 -0.07 0.887 47.5% -79 +117 — 31.3% -1.56 1–3 (25%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16
Career — 1725 125.1 -2.36 +1.34 0.940 48.6% -7 +36 -142 44.5% -0.37 37–33 (53%) 18–23 (44%) +0.56 — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.