H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Chanelle Scheepers vs Stéphanie Dubois H2H: 1-0
Chanelle Scheepers holds a 1–0 lead over Stéphanie Dubois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanelle Scheepers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanelle Scheepers won the 2012 Montreal second round 1-6 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 39
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2012* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Chanelle Scheepers | 1-6 6-3 6-0 | Stéphanie Dubois | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanelle Scheepers | #429 | #37 | 1,505 | 1,725 | 87 | 108 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Stéphanie Dubois | #352 | #87 | 757 | 1,569 | 23 | 61 | 27.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chanelle Scheepers | Stéphanie Dubois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #225 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #105 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #156 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #140 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,393 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,381 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #77 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #424 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |