H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Chanelle Scheepers vs Vania King H2H: 0-1

Vania King holds a 1–0 lead over Chanelle Scheepers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vania King leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2013 Guangzhou Open round of 32 2-6 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanelle Scheepers
RSA Age 42 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vania King #124 2-6 6-1 6-3 Chanelle Scheepers #76 Match data Sep 19, 2013* R32 Guangzhou Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanelle Scheepers #429 #37 1,505 1,724 87 108 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanelle Scheepers Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1
19 2003 1–1 50.0% #299 1,503 0 0 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1
24 2008 0–2 0.0% #187 1,485 0 0 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2009 4–8 33.3% #127 1,484 0 0 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2010 7–9 43.8% #103 1,523 0 0 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2011 20–19 51.3% #38 1,657 0 1 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2012 24–26 48.0% #60 1,678 0 1 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 2013 15–21 41.7% #80 1,571 0 1 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1
30 2014 15–17 46.9% #77 1,619 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2015 1–5 16.7% #424 1,569 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanelle Scheepers Vania King
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2009 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2010 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 16 11 27 59.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 5 13 18 27.8% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 49 66 115 42.6% 34 33 67 50.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 176/193 of Chanelle Scheepers's and 237/288 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Chanelle Scheepers Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/36 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2008 2/2 1.0 2.5 61.9% 56.5% 23.0% 58.3% 18.2% 44.2% 34.1% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2009 12/12 1.3 3.5 65.7% 55.7% 41.8% 51.0% 48.2% 50.9% 38.0% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2010 13/16 0.4 5.2 65.2% 58.3% 43.7% 55.9% 45.4% 52.9% 44.2% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 2011 36/39 1.0 4.5 64.1% 59.3% 42.3% 50.1% 45.2% 53.1% 45.2% 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2012 48/50 0.6 5.3 61.5% 58.4% 43.7% 46.8% 50.2% 52.6% 46.1% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 2013 30/36 0.9 4.9 60.7% 57.6% 43.3% 51.2% 43.5% 51.8% 45.5% 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
30 2014 29/32 0.7 5.1 65.3% 56.8% 42.1% 48.3% 46.3% 51.4% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 6/6 0.3 6.3 66.0% 57.3% 46.6% 57.3% 39.4% 53.3% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 176/195 0.8 4.9 63.2% 57.9% 42.8% 49.9% 46.1% 52.2% 44.9% — 237/288 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanelle Scheepers Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +16 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.4 -1.23
19 2003 1504 97.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.16 2008 1519 117.6 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -1.09
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.36
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.43
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -46 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2008 1485 92.0 +0.92 -0.21 0.610 39.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — 0–1 — +0.01 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2009 1485 101.3 -2.96 -2.55 0.773 44.9% +7 — — 36.7% -1.33 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 101.1 +0.02 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +18 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2010 1523 115.7 -1.51 +0.20 0.939 48.8% -20 +53 — 43.2% -0.27 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 100.4 +1.11 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
27 2011 1657 122.4 -2.12 +1.22 0.962 49.0% +14 -94 — 47.9% -0.13 11–5 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 108.7 +1.86 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2012 1678 136.9 -2.13 +2.84 0.974 49.4% +14 -66 -142 48.7% -0.06 6–11 (35%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 -0.91 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16
29 2013 1572 114.1 -3.06 +0.92 0.945 48.7% -12 +86 — 41.5% -0.54 6–4 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.8 +0.76 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +6 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17
30 2014 1620 124.9 -2.98 +1.97 0.959 49.1% -94 +102 — 46.1% -0.13 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 101.7 -0.75 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1569 103.8 -0.95 -0.07 0.887 47.5% -79 +117 — 31.3% -1.56 1–3 (25%) — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1725 125.1 -2.36 +1.34 0.940 48.6% -7 +36 -142 44.5% -0.37 37–33 (53%) 18–23 (44%) 100.4 +1.06 — 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +17 -80 -68 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 104.0 -1.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.