H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ching Ling Chang vs Robyn Legge H2H: 0-1

Robyn Legge holds a 1–0 lead over Ching Ling Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robyn Legge leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Robyn Legge won the 1972 ASB Classic quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Robyn Legge 6-3 6-2 Ching Ling Chang Match data Jan 8, 1972* QF ASB Classic WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ching Ling Chang 1,500 13 41 24.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robyn Legge 1,547 21 33 38.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Ching Ling Chang Robyn Legge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1971 0–5 0.0% 1,467 0 0 1969 1–1 50.0% 1,501 0 0
1972 0–3 0.0% 1,442 0 0 1970 7–13 35.0% 1,481 0 0
1973 5–11 31.2% 1,445 0 0 1971 1–5 16.7% 1,459 0 0
1974 8–16 33.3% 1,466 0 0 1972 5–9 35.7% 1,454 0 0
1975 0–6 0.0% 1,411 0 0 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,443 0 0
1975 0–1 0.0% 1,438 0 0
1980 7–3 70.0% 1,511 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Ching Ling Chang Robyn Legge
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1971 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1969 1 1 2 50.0%
1972 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1970 1 6 7 14.3% 6 7 13 46.2%
1973 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1971 1 5 6 16.7%
1974 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 0 1 1 0.0%
1975 0 1 1 0.0%
1980 3 1 4 75.0%
Career 3 7 10 30.0% 6 15 21 28.6% 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% Career 0 1 1 0.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 16 20 36 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Ching Ling Chang Robyn Legge
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1971 1468 98.2 +43 0.0% -4.00 -0.06 1969 1501 101.1 50.0% 0.00 +0.45
1972 1442 90.9 0.0% -4.50 +0.27 1970 1482 101.1 -18 +62 40.4% -1.06 2–5 (29%) +1.95
1973 1445 99.8 +24 +44 34.3% -1.09 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +1.08 1971 1459 97.8 +41 16.7% -2.92 1–1 +0.09
1974 1467 93.7 +96 -3 35.8% -1.49 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 102.1 +0.93 1972 1455 98.9 +100 41.4% -0.76 1–2 (33%) +1.69
1975 1412 92.1 7.7% -3.31 0–1 1–0 +0.28 1974 1444 97.4 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 +0.11
1975 1439 102.2 0.0% -2.50 -0.13
1980 1511 121.0 +67 66.7% +1.86 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.90
Career 1500 93.3 +96 +8 +44 28.3% -1.86 3–6 (33%) 5–1 (83%) 101.2 +4.81 Career 1547 105.4 -18 +69 42.4% -0.69 4–10 (29%) 3–3 (50%) 93.8 +9.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.