H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Chloe Paquet vs Caroline Garcia H2H: 1-3
Caroline Garcia holds a 3–1 lead over Chloe Paquet in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Caroline Garcia leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2022 Palermo third round 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2022* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Caroline Garcia | 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 | Chloe Paquet | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2019* | Jurmala | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Chloe Paquet | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| May 24, 2019* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Caroline Garcia | 6-3 6-4 | Chloe Paquet | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Caroline Garcia | 7-5 6-4 | Chloe Paquet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chloe Paquet | Caroline Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |