Home
/
H2H
/
Chris Evert vs Hana Mandlikova
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Chris Evert vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 19-8 (incl. walkovers)
Chris Evert vs Hana Mandlikova: 19–7 excluding walkovers; 19–8 including 1 walkover. Across 27 main-draw results including walkovers, Chris Evert leads 8–2 on hard courts and 7–1 on clay. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1989 Indian Wells Open round of 16 3-6 7-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H including walkovers
19
–
8
27 main-draw results
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Hana Mandlikova
#51
3-6 7-6 6-0
Chris Evert
#4
Match data
Mar 6, 1989
R16
Indian Wells Open
WTA 500
Hard
Chris Evert
#4
6-3 7-5
Hana Mandlikova
#3
Match data
Apr 25, 1987*
SF
Houston
WTA 250
Clay
Chris Evert
#2
7-5 6-0
Hana Mandlikova
#4
Match data
Feb 28, 1987*
SF
Key Biscayne
WTA 250
Hard
Hana Mandlikova
#4
7-6 7-5
Chris Evert
#2
Match data
Jul 6, 1986*
SF
Wimbledon
Grand Slam
Grass
Chris Evert
#2
6-1 6-1
Hana Mandlikova
#5
Match data
Jun 7, 1986*
SF
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
Hana Mandlikova
#5
6-3 7-5
Chris Evert
#2
Match data
Mar 17, 1986
SF
WTA Finals
WTA Finals
Carpet
Hana Mandlikova
4-6 6-2 6-3
Chris Evert
#1
Match data
Sep 8, 1985*
SF
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Chris Evert
#1
3-6 6-2 6-4
Hana Mandlikova
#3
Match data
Aug 10, 1985*
SF
Canadian Open
Series Category 4
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Hana Mandlikova
#7
6-2 6-4
Chris Evert
#2
Match data
Feb 24, 1985*
F
Oakland
WTA 250
Carpet
Chris Evert
#2
6-1 6-2
Hana Mandlikova
#3
Match data
Jul 8, 1984*
SF
Wimbledon
Grand Slam
Grass
Chris Evert
6-4 6-3
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
Sep 9, 1983*
QF
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Chris Evert
4-6 6-3 6-2
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
Jun 2, 1983*
QF
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
Chris Evert
6-1 6-4
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
Apr 16, 1983*
SF
Amelia Island
WTA 250
Clay
Chris Evert
6-3 6-1
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
Sep 13, 1982*
F
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Chris Evert
6-0 6-2
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
May 9, 1982*
F
Perugia
WTA 250
Clay
Chris Evert
6-4 7-5
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
Dec 11, 1981*
QF
Australian Open
Grand Slam
Grass
Chris Evert
5-7 6-2 7-5
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
Nov 21, 1981*
SF
Tokyo Lion Cup
WTA 250
Carpet
Chris Evert
6-1 6-3
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
Sep 11, 1981*
QF
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Chris Evert
6-3 7-6
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
Aug 22, 1981*
QF
Canadian Open
WTA 500
Hard
Chris Evert
6-2 6-2
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
Jul 6, 1981*
F
Wimbledon
Grand Slam
Grass
Hana Mandlikova
7-5 6-4
Chris Evert
Match data
Jun 6, 1981*
SF
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
Hana Mandlikova
(w/o)
Chris Evert
Match data
Jan 7, 1981
RR
Landover
WTA 250
Carpet
Hana Mandlikova
6-1 6-4
Chris Evert
Match data
Sep 27, 1980*
SF
Atlanta
WTA 250
Carpet
Chris Evert
5-7 6-1 6-1
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
Sep 8, 1980*
F
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Chris Evert
3-6 6-1 6-2
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
Aug 15, 1980*
QF
Canadian Open
WTA 500
Hard
Chris Evert
6-7 6-2 6-2
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
Jun 7, 1980*
SF
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
Chris Evert
6-4 3-6 6-3
Hana Mandlikova
Match data
May 10, 1980*
SF
Perugia
WTA 250
Clay
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Chris Evert
#10
#1
231
2,610
1,228
158
88.6%
18
0
5
13
112
154
Hana Mandlikova
#31
#3
157
2,315
518
191
73.1%
4
0
0
4
19
27
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
14
1969
4–2
66.7%
—
1,560
0
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
15
1970
14–4
77.8%
—
1,744
0
4
1977
0–1
0.0%
—
1,491
0
0
16
1971
28–2
93.3%
—
2,003
0
11
1978
23–8
74.2%
—
1,758
0
2
17
1972
45–8
84.9%
—
2,249
0
15
1979
37–14
72.5%
—
1,990
0
7
18
1973
86–9
90.5%
—
2,374
0
27
1980
76–17
81.7%
#4
2,235
1
13
19
1974
97–7
93.3%
—
2,450
2
40
1981
56–24
70.0%
#5
2,127
2
16
20
1975
85–7
92.4%
#1
2,544
4
53
1982
35–19
64.8%
#7
2,025
2
16
21
1976
63–5
92.6%
#1
2,545
6
62
1983
44–21
67.7%
—
1,982
2
16
22
1977
63–4
94.0%
#1
2,568
7
73
1984
47–11
81.0%
#3
2,084
2
21
23
1978
49–4
92.5%
#2
2,607
8
80
1985
53–13
80.3%
#3
2,213
3
24
24
1979
81–14
85.3%
#2
2,440
9
87
1986
44–15
74.6%
#4
2,242
3
24
25
1980
66–9
88.0%
#1
2,468
11
95
1987
47–13
78.3%
#5
2,156
4
27
26
1981
64–9
87.7%
#1
2,475
12
103
1988
15–7
68.2%
#29
2,045
4
27
27
1982
66–6
91.7%
#2
2,491
14
112
1989
33–19
63.5%
#14
1,945
4
27
28
1983
59–11
84.3%
#2
2,400
15
118
1990
8–9
47.1%
#31
1,810
4
27
29
1984
68–8
89.5%
#2
2,409
16
124
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
30
1985
77–8
90.6%
#2
2,428
17
133
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31
1986
56–6
90.3%
#2
2,422
18
139
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
1987
68–12
85.0%
#3
2,334
18
144
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
1988
62–13
82.7%
#3
2,285
18
148
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
1989
27–10
73.0%
#10
2,167
18
148
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
14
1969
—
—
—
—
4
2
6
66.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
15
1970
—
—
—
—
14
2
16
87.5%
0
2
2
0.0%
—
—
—
—
1977
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16
1971
—
—
—
—
20
1
21
95.2%
8
1
9
88.9%
—
—
—
—
1978
1
1
2
50.0%
7
1
8
87.5%
8
3
11
72.7%
—
—
—
—
17
1972
3
1
4
75.0%
19
2
21
90.5%
18
3
21
85.7%
5
2
7
71.4%
1979
4
3
7
57.1%
8
3
11
72.7%
23
4
27
85.2%
2
4
6
33.3%
18
1973
17
1
18
94.4%
46
4
50
92.0%
15
4
19
78.9%
8
0
8
100.0%
1980
19
4
23
82.6%
19
5
24
79.2%
18
3
21
85.7%
20
5
25
80.0%
19
1974
19
1
20
95.0%
40
0
40
100.0%
24
2
26
92.3%
14
4
18
77.8%
1981
11
3
14
78.6%
14
5
19
73.7%
9
3
12
75.0%
22
13
35
62.9%
20
1975
26
2
28
92.9%
36
0
36
100.0%
5
2
7
71.4%
18
3
21
85.7%
1982
11
5
16
68.8%
12
5
17
70.6%
8
5
13
61.5%
4
4
8
50.0%
21
1976
12
1
13
92.3%
11
0
11
100.0%
9
0
9
100.0%
31
4
35
88.6%
1983
12
4
16
75.0%
16
6
22
72.7%
9
5
14
64.3%
7
6
13
53.8%
22
1977
12
0
12
100.0%
12
0
12
100.0%
8
2
10
80.0%
31
2
33
93.9%
1984
6
4
10
60.0%
9
4
13
69.2%
5
1
6
83.3%
27
2
29
93.1%
23
1978
17
0
17
100.0%
5
0
5
100.0%
10
2
12
83.3%
17
2
19
89.5%
1985
22
5
27
81.5%
7
2
9
77.8%
10
4
14
71.4%
14
2
16
87.5%
24
1979
18
4
22
81.8%
20
1
21
95.2%
12
1
13
92.3%
31
8
39
79.5%
1986
7
2
9
77.8%
11
3
14
78.6%
8
2
10
80.0%
18
8
26
69.2%
25
1980
17
0
17
100.0%
16
0
16
100.0%
10
1
11
90.9%
23
8
31
74.2%
1987
14
5
19
73.7%
8
3
11
72.7%
12
1
13
92.3%
13
4
17
76.5%
26
1981
14
2
16
87.5%
25
1
26
96.2%
16
1
17
94.1%
9
5
14
64.3%
1988
11
4
15
73.3%
2
2
4
50.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
—
—
—
—
27
1982
24
1
25
96.0%
22
2
24
91.7%
10
1
11
90.9%
10
2
12
83.3%
1989
19
9
28
67.9%
5
4
9
55.6%
3
2
5
60.0%
6
4
10
60.0%
28
1983
19
3
22
86.4%
22
0
22
100.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
16
7
23
69.6%
1990
6
5
11
54.5%
1
2
3
33.3%
1
2
3
33.3%
—
—
—
—
29
1984
21
1
22
95.5%
24
3
27
88.9%
16
2
18
88.9%
7
2
9
77.8%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
30
1985
21
2
23
91.3%
21
1
22
95.5%
16
2
18
88.9%
19
3
22
86.4%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31
1986
21
2
23
91.3%
20
1
21
95.2%
5
1
6
83.3%
10
2
12
83.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
1987
18
5
23
78.3%
23
2
25
92.0%
9
2
11
81.8%
18
3
21
85.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
1988
33
6
39
84.6%
13
2
15
86.7%
5
1
6
83.3%
11
4
15
73.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
1989
14
5
19
73.7%
5
2
7
71.4%
7
2
9
77.8%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
326
37
363
89.8%
418
26
444
94.1%
205
33
238
86.1%
279
62
341
81.8%
—
143
54
197
72.6%
119
46
165
72.1%
116
36
152
76.3%
133
52
185
71.9%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.