H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 21-8 (incl. walkovers)

Chris Evert vs Hana Mandlikova: 21–7 excluding walkovers; 21–8 including 1 walkover. Across 29 main-draw results including walkovers, Chris Evert leads 9–2 on hard courts and 8–1 on clay. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1989 Indian Wells Open round of 16 3-6 7-6 6-0.

USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H including walkovers
21 – 8
29 main-draw results
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Mandlikova #51 3-6 7-6 6-0 Chris Evert #4 Match data Mar 6, 1989 R16 Indian Wells Open WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert #4 6-3 7-5 Hana Mandlikova #3 Match data Apr 25, 1987* SF Houston WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert #2 7-5 6-0 Hana Mandlikova #4 Match data Feb 28, 1987* SF Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard
Hana Mandlikova #4 7-6 7-5 Chris Evert #2 Match data Jul 6, 1986* SF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert #2 6-1 6-1 Hana Mandlikova #5 Match data Jun 7, 1986* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Hana Mandlikova #5 6-3 7-5 Chris Evert #2 Match data Mar 17, 1986 SF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Hana Mandlikova 4-6 6-2 6-3 Chris Evert #1 Match data Sep 8, 1985* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert #1 3-6 6-2 6-4 Hana Mandlikova Match data Aug 10, 1985* SF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert #2 6-3 6-3 Hana Mandlikova #3 Match data Apr 7, 1985 F Ford Challenge Cup (palm Beach Gardens) WTA 250 Clay
Hana Mandlikova #7 6-2 6-4 Chris Evert #2 Match data Feb 24, 1985* F Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert #2 6-1 6-2 Hana Mandlikova #3 Match data Jul 8, 1984* SF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 6-4 6-3 Hana Mandlikova Match data Sep 9, 1983* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert 4-6 6-3 6-2 Hana Mandlikova Match data Jun 2, 1983* QF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Chris Evert 6-1 6-4 Hana Mandlikova Match data Apr 16, 1983* SF Amelia Island Championships WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Hana Mandlikova Match data Sep 13, 1982* F US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert 6-0 6-2 Hana Mandlikova Match data May 9, 1982* F Perugia WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert 6-4 7-5 Hana Mandlikova Match data Dec 11, 1981* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 5-7 6-2 7-5 Hana Mandlikova Match data Nov 21, 1981* SF Tokyo Lion Cup WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-1 6-3 Hana Mandlikova Match data Sep 11, 1981* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert 6-3 7-6 Hana Mandlikova Match data Aug 22, 1981* QF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert 6-2 6-2 Hana Mandlikova Match data Jul 6, 1981* F Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Hana Mandlikova 7-5 6-4 Chris Evert Match data Jun 6, 1981* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Chris Evert 6-4 6-3 Hana Mandlikova Match data Apr 5, 1981 F Clairol Crown (la Costa) WTA 250 Hard
Hana Mandlikova (w/o) Chris Evert Match data Jan 7, 1981 RR Landover WTA 250 Carpet
Hana Mandlikova 6-1 6-4 Chris Evert Match data Sep 27, 1980* SF Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 5-7 6-1 6-1 Hana Mandlikova Match data Sep 8, 1980* F US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert 3-6 6-1 6-2 Hana Mandlikova Match data Aug 15, 1980* QF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert 6-7 6-2 6-2 Hana Mandlikova Match data Jun 7, 1980* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Chris Evert 6-4 3-6 6-3 Hana Mandlikova Match data May 10, 1980* SF Perugia WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert — #1 231 2,617 1,246 158 88.7% 18 0 5 19 112 154
Hana Mandlikova — #3 157 2,316 518 193 72.9% 4 0 0 6 17 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Hana Mandlikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 0 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 4 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,758 0 2
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 8 1979 37–14 72.5% — 1,991 0 7
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 20 1980 76–17 81.7% #4 2,237 1 13
19 1974 100–7 93.5% — 2,459 2 36 1981 56–25 69.1% #5 2,128 2 16
20 1975 88–7 92.6% #1 2,560 4 52 1982 35–19 64.8% #7 2,027 2 16
21 1976 71–5 93.4% #1 2,566 6 64 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,983 2 16
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,580 7 75 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,085 2 21
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,614 8 82 1985 53–14 79.1% #3 2,211 3 24
24 1979 82–14 85.4% #2 2,444 9 90 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,242 3 24
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,471 11 98 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,157 4 27
26 1981 65–9 87.8% #1 2,480 12 107 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,045 4 27
27 1982 67–6 91.8% #2 2,497 14 117 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,946 4 27
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,403 15 123 1990 8–9 47.1% — 1,810 4 27
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,412 16 129 — — — — — — —
30 1985 78–8 90.7% #2 2,434 17 139 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,425 18 145 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,336 18 150 — — — — — — —
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,286 18 154 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 154 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Hana Mandlikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 23 4 27 85.2% 2 4 6 33.3%
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 19 5 24 79.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 20 5 25 80.0%
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 42 0 42 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1981 11 4 15 73.3% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9%
20 1975 27 2 29 93.1% 37 0 37 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 1982 11 5 16 68.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0%
21 1976 15 1 16 93.8% 11 0 11 100.0% 13 0 13 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% 1983 12 4 16 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8%
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 27 2 29 93.1%
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1985 22 5 27 81.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 2 16 87.5%
24 1979 19 4 23 82.6% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 18 8 26 69.2%
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 13 4 17 76.5%
26 1981 15 2 17 88.2% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1988 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 23 2 25 92.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% 1989 19 9 28 67.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 22 1 23 95.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 332 37 369 90.0% 423 26 449 94.2% 209 33 242 86.4% 279 62 341 81.8% — 143 55 198 72.2% 119 47 166 71.7% 116 36 152 76.3% 133 52 185 71.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Hana Mandlikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34 1977 1492 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — 0.00
16 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 1978 1759 142.2 — — — — — -127 -39 71.4% +1.84 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 104.0 +1.40
17 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -8.05 1979 1991 150.8 — — — — -305 -197 +5 67.6% +1.46 8–3 (73%) 5–6 (45%) 107.5 -0.89
18 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.25 1980 2238 169.1 — — — — -86 -220 -74 77.5% +2.09 15–12 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 107.9 -9.35
19 1974 2460 181.1 — — — — -66 +155 -101 88.4% +3.39 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.58 1981 2129 169.7 — — — — -47 -13 +79 69.9% +1.55 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 100.5 -7.13
20 1975 2561 182.1 — — — — -54 +157 -241 88.9% +3.34 9–3 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -5.39 1982 2027 155.4 — — — — +43 +110 +36 60.3% +0.61 12–5 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -5.96
21 1976 2567 181.1 — — — — +42 +122 -103 87.8% +3.12 10–2 (83%) 8–4 (67%) 102.4 -3.25 1983 1984 163.7 — — — — +67 +169 +26 70.3% +1.45 3–9 (25%) 7–1 (88%) 95.7 -3.62
22 1977 2581 181.8 — — — — +147 +142 -83 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -2.71 1984 2085 166.1 — — — — +42 +34 -16 76.7% +2.05 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 103.0 -2.48
23 1978 2615 179.6 — — — — +109 +62 -113 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.67 1985 2211 170.8 — — — — +71 -92 -92 75.0% +1.78 9–5 (64%) 12–3 (80%) 109.1 -5.37
24 1979 2445 178.7 — — — — +15 +298 +73 81.0% +2.77 13–2 (87%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -3.77 1986 2242 175.0 — — — — +27 -50 -79 70.7% +1.50 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 -6.69
25 1980 2472 177.7 — — — — +82 +339 +114 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 -4.52 1987 2157 169.0 — — — — +17 +18 +141 75.8% +1.97 9–3 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 102.5 -3.70
26 1981 2480 182.5 — — — — +11 +299 +140 86.3% +3.09 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.5 -4.00 1988 2046 145.0 — — — — +89 +59 +204 65.3% +1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 -0.30
27 1982 2497 179.5 — — — — +60 +259 +77 88.4% +3.34 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -4.08 1989 1946 155.2 — — — — +75 +101 +225 57.5% +0.38 15–3 (83%) 9–3 (75%) 105.4 -3.66
28 1983 2404 176.6 — — — — +46 +319 +184 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.42 1990 1811 125.0 — — — — +120 +175 +361 51.4% +0.19 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.31
29 1984 2412 175.6 — — — — +69 +210 +144 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.2 -4.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2434 176.7 — — — — +28 +244 +130 86.0% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 -3.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 2426 177.4 — — — — +7 +245 +117 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 2336 176.4 — — — — +22 +298 +206 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.1 -4.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 2287 173.9 — — — — +33 +322 +236 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 -3.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 2168 158.7 — — — — +39 +352 +268 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2617 182.2 — — — — +20 +195 0 84.6% +2.92 166–50 (77%) 85–50 (63%) 106.2 -5.42 — 2317 169.5 — — — — +11 -15 +16 70.1% +1.51 107–63 (63%) 76–52 (59%) 107.1 -6.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.