H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chris Evert vs Janet Newberry H2H: 8-0

Chris Evert holds a 8–0 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 3–0 on clay and 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1979 Rome fourth round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
8 – 0
8 main draw meetings
Janet Newberry
USA Age 72 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 1979* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Chris Evert 6-2 6-1 Janet Newberry Match data
Feb 17, 1977* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Chris Evert 6-1 6-3 Janet Newberry Match data
Oct 16, 1975* Orlando WTA 250 R32 Clay Chris Evert 6-2 6-1 Janet Newberry Match data
Oct 3, 1975* Mission Viejo WTA 250 R16 Hard Chris Evert 7-6(1) 6-1 Janet Newberry Match data
Aug 23, 1974* Newport WTA 250 QF Grass Chris Evert 6-2 7-5 Janet Newberry Match data
Dec 26, 1973 Australian Open Grand Slam QF Grass Chris Evert 6-2 6-4 Janet Newberry Match data
Jun 30, 1972* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Chris Evert 6-3 6-0 Janet Newberry Match data
Apr 20, 1971* Charlotte WTA 250 SF Clay Chris Evert 6-0 6-1 Janet Newberry Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Janet Newberry — — — 1,919 238 187 56.0% 0 1 0 1 6 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Janet Newberry
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1968 7–5 58.3% — 1,541 0 0
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 1969 13–6 68.4% — 1,645 0 2
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1970 20–7 74.1% — 1,726 0 5
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1971 15–9 62.5% — 1,765 0 5
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1972 20–17 54.1% — 1,707 0 5
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1973 32–24 57.1% — 1,851 0 5
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1974 22–22 50.0% — 1,810 0 5
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1975 31–22 58.5% — 1,899 0 6
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1976 14–10 58.3% — 1,859 0 6
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1977 25–22 53.2% — 1,873 0 7
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1978 15–14 51.7% — 1,831 0 7
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1979 12–21 36.4% — 1,679 0 7
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1980 12–8 60.0% — 1,631 0 8
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 — — — — — — —
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 — — — — — — —
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —