H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chris Evert vs Leslie Allen H2H: 2-0

Chris Evert holds a 2–0 lead over Leslie Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1982 Oakland quarterfinal 6-3 3-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Leslie Allen
Age 69 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 27, 1982* Oakland WTA 250 QF Carpet Chris Evert 6-3 3-6 7-6 Leslie Allen Match data
Mar 1, 1979* Dallas WTA 250 R32 Carpet Chris Evert 6-4 6-0 Leslie Allen Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Leslie Allen — — — 1,911 87 121 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Leslie Allen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 — — — — — — —
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 — — — — — — —
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 — — — — — — —
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 — — — — — — —
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1978 0–3 0.0% — 1,442 0 0
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1979 6–10 37.5% — 1,532 0 0
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,609 0 0
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1981 27–23 54.0% — 1,774 0 1
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1982 25–22 53.2% — 1,828 0 1
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1983 12–17 41.4% — 1,779 0 1
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1984 2–14 12.5% — 1,576 0 1
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,555 0 1
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,526 0 1
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,508 0 1
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —