H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Chris Evert vs Pam Casale H2H: 5-0

Chris Evert holds a 5–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1986 Wimbledon second round 6-0 5-7 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 1986* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Chris Evert #2 6-0 5-7 6-1 Pam Casale #26 Match data
Oct 25, 1985* Brighton WTA 250 R16 Carpet Chris Evert #2 6-3 6-1 Pam Casale #14 Match data
Apr 12, 1985* Hilton Head WTA 250 R16 Clay Chris Evert #2 6-1 6-4 Pam Casale #14 Match data
May 21, 1983* Berlin WTA 500 QF Clay Chris Evert 6-1 6-4 Pam Casale Match data
Jun 1, 1982* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Chris Evert 6-2 6-0 Pam Casale Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,811 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,746 0 0
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,769 0 0
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,654 0 0
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,542 0 0
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,537 0 0
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,516 0 0
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 — — — — — — —
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 — — — — — — —
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —