H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Pam Shriver H2H: 18-4

Chris Evert holds an 18–4 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 22 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 7–3 on carpet and 5–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1988 WTA Finals quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
18 – 4
22 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #5 7-5 6-4 Chris Evert #3 Match data Nov 14, 1988 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Pam Shriver #5 6-4 4-6 6-0 Chris Evert #3 Match data Nov 8, 1987* F Worcester WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert #3 7-5 6-3 Pam Shriver #5 Match data Oct 17, 1987* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Pam Shriver #5 6-4 6-1 Chris Evert #3 Match data Aug 22, 1987* SF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert #3 6-1 6-3 Pam Shriver #5 Match data Mar 22, 1987* F Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert #2 6-4 6-4 Pam Shriver #6 Match data Aug 16, 1986* SF Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert #1 6-4 7-5 Pam Shriver #4 Match data Sep 29, 1985* F New Orleans WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert #1 6-4 6-1 Pam Shriver Match data Jul 21, 1985* F Newport WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver 6-2 6-4 Chris Evert Match data Aug 3, 1983* F Sydney Indoors WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 7-6 6-7 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data Mar 12, 1983* SF Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-2 6-3 Pam Shriver Match data Dec 19, 1982* QF East Rutherford WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-4 7-5 Pam Shriver Match data Oct 30, 1982* SF Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-2 6-4 Pam Shriver Match data Apr 10, 1982* QF Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Chris Evert 3-6 7-6(2) 6-3 Pam Shriver Match data Dec 17, 1981* R32 East Rutherford WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 7-5 6-0 Pam Shriver Match data Oct 17, 1981* SF Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Pam Shriver Match data Jul 5, 1981* SF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Pam Shriver Match data Apr 25, 1981* QF Amelia Island Championships WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert 6-3 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data Apr 12, 1981* F Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Chris Evert 6-4 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data Jan 10, 1981* R32 Landover WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-4 7-5 Pam Shriver Match data Aug 15, 1980* SF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert 7-5 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data Jun 13, 1980* SF Chichester WTA 250 Grass
Chris Evert 7-5 6-4 Pam Shriver Match data Sep 11, 1978* F US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert — #1 231 2,617 1,246 158 88.7% 18 0 5 19 112 154
Pam Shriver — #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 6 18 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 4 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,814 0 1
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 8 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,057 0 2
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 20 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,140 0 4
19 1974 100–7 93.5% — 2,459 2 36 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,100 0 5
20 1975 88–7 92.6% #1 2,560 4 52 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,164 0 8
21 1976 71–5 93.4% #1 2,566 6 64 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,061 0 10
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,580 7 75 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,119 0 14
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,614 8 82 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1979 82–14 85.4% #2 2,444 9 90 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,256 0 20
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,471 11 98 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 1981 65–9 87.8% #1 2,480 12 107 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 1982 67–6 91.8% #2 2,497 14 117 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,403 15 123 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,412 16 129 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 1985 78–8 90.7% #2 2,434 17 139 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,425 18 145 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,700 0 24
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,336 18 150 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,286 18 154 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 154 1997 2–1 66.7% — 1,635 0 24

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 42 0 42 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1975 27 2 29 93.1% 37 0 37 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1976 15 1 16 93.8% 11 0 11 100.0% 13 0 13 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1979 19 4 23 82.6% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 1981 15 2 17 88.2% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 23 2 25 92.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 22 1 23 95.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7% 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 332 37 369 90.0% 423 26 449 94.2% 209 33 242 86.4% 279 62 341 81.8% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +102 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.78
16 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 1979 1815 147.6 — — — — +5 — -40 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.2 -0.54
17 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -8.05 1980 2057 163.7 — — — — -46 -407 -68 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 105.0 -7.43
18 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.25 1981 2140 166.7 — — — — -89 -333 -10 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.71
19 1974 2460 181.1 — — — — -66 +155 -101 88.4% +3.39 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.58 1982 2100 162.2 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.30
20 1975 2561 182.1 — — — — -54 +157 -241 88.9% +3.34 9–3 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -5.39 1983 2164 167.9 — — — — +34 -322 +15 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.97
21 1976 2567 181.1 — — — — +42 +122 -103 87.8% +3.12 10–2 (83%) 8–4 (67%) 102.4 -3.25 1984 2061 163.7 — — — — +77 — +83 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.72
22 1977 2581 181.8 — — — — +147 +142 -83 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -2.71 1985 2119 161.3 — — — — +48 -302 +86 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 -0.54
23 1978 2615 179.6 — — — — +109 +62 -113 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.67 1986 2197 175.3 — — — — +22 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -5.27
24 1979 2445 178.7 — — — — +15 +298 +73 81.0% +2.77 13–2 (87%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -3.77 1987 2256 167.5 — — — — 0 — +38 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.72
25 1980 2472 177.7 — — — — +82 +339 +114 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 -4.52 1988 2198 167.6 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.89
26 1981 2480 182.5 — — — — +11 +299 +140 86.3% +3.09 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.5 -4.00 1989 1961 141.1 — — — — +38 — +227 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.50
27 1982 2497 179.5 — — — — +60 +259 +77 88.4% +3.34 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -4.08 1990 1915 136.2 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 1983 2404 176.6 — — — — +46 +319 +184 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.42 1991 1823 146.7 — — — — -5 — +350 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.31
29 1984 2412 175.6 — — — — +69 +210 +144 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.2 -4.58 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 1985 2434 176.7 — — — — +28 +244 +130 86.0% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 -3.85 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +5 — +301 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 1986 2426 177.4 — — — — +7 +245 +117 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.46 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 1987 2336 176.4 — — — — +22 +298 +206 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.1 -4.70 1995 1650 116.2 — — — — -3 — +276 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 1988 2287 173.9 — — — — +33 +322 +236 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 -3.78 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 1989 2168 158.7 — — — — +39 +352 +268 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.27 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -19 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 2617 182.2 — — — — +20 +195 0 84.6% +2.92 166–50 (77%) 85–50 (63%) 106.2 -5.42 — 2304 166.7 — — — — +10 -332 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.