H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Chris Evert vs Pam Shriver H2H: 18-4
Chris Evert holds a 18–4 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 22 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 7–3 on carpet and 5–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1988 Virginia Slims Championships quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
18
–
4
22 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1988 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | QF | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 7-5 6-4 | Chris Evert | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1987* | Worcester | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-4 4-6 6-0 | Chris Evert | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1987* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Chris Evert | 7-5 6-3 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1987 | Toronto | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Pam Shriver | 6-4 6-1 | Chris Evert | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1987* | Dallas | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Chris Evert | 6-1 6-3 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1986* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Chris Evert | 6-4 6-4 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1985* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Chris Evert | 6-4 7-5 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1985* | Newport | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Chris Evert | 6-4 6-1 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1983* | Sydney Indoors | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-2 6-4 | Chris Evert | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1983* | Dallas | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Chris Evert | 7-6 6-7 6-2 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Dec 19, 1982* | East Rutherford | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Chris Evert | 6-2 6-3 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1982* | Brighton | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Chris Evert | 6-4 7-5 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1982* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Chris Evert | 6-2 6-4 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Dec 17, 1981* | East Rutherford | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Chris Evert | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1981* | Deerfield Beach | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Chris Evert | 7-5 6-0 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Jul 5, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | SF | Grass | Chris Evert | 6-3 6-1 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1981* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Chris Evert | 6-3 6-1 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1981* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Chris Evert | 6-3 6-2 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1981* | Landover | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Chris Evert | 6-4 6-2 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1980 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Chris Evert | 6-4 7-5 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1980* | Chichester | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Chris Evert | 7-5 6-2 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Sep 11, 1978* | US Open | Grand Slam | F | Hard | Chris Evert | 7-5 6-4 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | #10 | #1 | 231 | 2,574 | 1,222 | 157 | 88.6% | 18 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 115 | 146 |
| Pam Shriver | #234 | #3 | 163 | 2,302 | 624 | 277 | 69.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Evert | Pam Shriver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1970 | 14–4 | 77.8% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 23–8 | 74.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1971 | 28–2 | 93.3% | — | 2,002 | 0 | 11 | 1979 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1972 | 45–8 | 84.9% | — | 2,235 | 0 | 15 | 1980 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 2,027 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1973 | 86–9 | 90.5% | — | 2,359 | 0 | 27 | 1981 | 58–25 | 69.9% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1974 | 93–7 | 93.0% | — | 2,438 | 2 | 39 | 1982 | 47–19 | 71.2% | — | 2,087 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1975 | 84–7 | 92.3% | — | 2,508 | 4 | 51 | 1983 | 52–15 | 77.6% | — | 2,161 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1976 | 63–5 | 92.6% | — | 2,525 | 6 | 60 | 1984 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #4 | 2,060 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1977 | 63–4 | 94.0% | — | 2,553 | 7 | 71 | 1985 | 54–13 | 80.6% | #4 | 2,117 | 0 | 14 |
| 23 | 1978 | 49–4 | 92.5% | — | 2,568 | 8 | 78 | 1986 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #5 | 2,194 | 0 | 16 |
| 24 | 1979 | 81–14 | 85.3% | — | 2,394 | 9 | 85 | 1987 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,254 | 0 | 20 |
| 25 | 1980 | 66–9 | 88.0% | — | 2,417 | 11 | 93 | 1988 | 58–14 | 80.6% | #5 | 2,188 | 0 | 24 |
| 26 | 1981 | 64–9 | 87.7% | — | 2,423 | 12 | 101 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #18 | 1,955 | 0 | 24 |
| 27 | 1982 | 66–6 | 91.7% | — | 2,459 | 14 | 110 | 1990 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #66 | 1,911 | 0 | 24 |
| 28 | 1983 | 59–11 | 84.3% | — | 2,353 | 15 | 116 | 1991 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,822 | 0 | 24 |
| 29 | 1984 | 68–8 | 89.5% | #2 | 2,388 | 16 | 122 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,858 | 0 | 24 |
| 30 | 1985 | 77–8 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,417 | 17 | 131 | 1993 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,819 | 0 | 24 |
| 31 | 1986 | 56–6 | 90.3% | #2 | 2,415 | 18 | 137 | 1994 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,699 | 0 | 24 |
| 32 | 1987 | 68–12 | 85.0% | #3 | 2,331 | 18 | 142 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #110 | 1,649 | 0 | 24 |
| 33 | 1988 | 61–12 | 83.6% | #3 | 2,285 | 18 | 146 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 24 |
| 34 | 1989 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #10 | 2,141 | 18 | 146 | 1997 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #234 | 1,635 | 0 | 24 |