H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Chris Evert vs Zina Garrison H2H: 9-2

Chris Evert holds a 9–2 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 4–0 on carpet and 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1989 US Open quarterfinal 7-6(1) 6-2.

USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
9 2
11 main draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 7, 1989* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Zina Garrison #6 7-6(1) 6-2 Chris Evert #4 Match data
Mar 25, 1989* Key Biscayne WTA 250 SF Hard Chris Evert #4 6-3 6-1 Zina Garrison #7 Match data
Apr 23, 1988* Houston WTA 250 SF Clay Chris Evert #3 7-5 6-2 Zina Garrison #11 Match data
Mar 21, 1987* Dallas WTA 250 SF Carpet Chris Evert #3 3-6 6-1 6-0 Zina Garrison #7 Match data
Mar 15, 1986* Dallas WTA 250 QF Carpet Chris Evert #2 6-4 6-3 Zina Garrison #9 Match data
Apr 21, 1985* Amelia Island WTA 250 F Clay Zina Garrison #9 6-4 6-3 Chris Evert #2 Match data
Feb 23, 1985* Oakland WTA 250 SF Carpet Chris Evert #2 6-3 6-2 Zina Garrison #9 Match data
Apr 14, 1984* Hilton Head WTA 250 SF Clay Chris Evert #2 6-1 6-4 Zina Garrison #8 Match data
Mar 23, 1983 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Chris Evert 6-3 6-0 Zina Garrison Match data
Oct 7, 1982* Deerfield Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Chris Evert 6-0 6-2 Zina Garrison Match data
Sep 8, 1982* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Chris Evert 6-4 6-3 Zina Garrison Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% 1,560 0 1
15 1970 14–4 77.8% 1,750 0 4
16 1971 28–2 93.3% 2,002 0 11 1980 2–2 50.0% 1,529 0 1
17 1972 45–8 84.9% 2,235 0 15 1981 5–5 50.0% 1,568 0 1
18 1973 86–9 90.5% 2,359 0 27 1982 23–15 60.5% 1,853 0 1
19 1974 93–7 93.0% 2,438 2 39 1983 38–18 67.9% 1,989 0 1
20 1975 84–7 92.3% 2,508 4 51 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1976 63–5 92.6% 2,525 6 60 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1977 63–4 94.0% 2,553 7 71 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1978 49–4 92.5% 2,568 8 78 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1979 81–14 85.3% 2,394 9 85 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 1980 66–9 88.0% 2,417 11 93 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 1981 64–9 87.7% 2,423 12 101 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 1982 66–6 91.7% 2,459 14 110 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 1983 59–11 84.3% 2,353 15 116 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146