H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Chris Oneil vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 0-3
Patricia Medrado holds a 3–0 lead over Chris Oneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Patricia Medrado leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1982 Lugano third round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1982* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 6-4 7-6 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1981* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 6-2 6-3 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1978* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Patricia Medrado | 6-2 7-5 6-3 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chris Oneil | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |