H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Chris Oneil vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 0-2
Yvonne Vermaak holds a 2–0 lead over Chris Oneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yvonne Vermaak leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yvonne Vermaak won the 1980 Detroit second round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 1980* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Yvonne Vermaak | 7-6 6-4 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1975* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Yvonne Vermaak | 6-4 6-2 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chris Oneil | Yvonne Vermaak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 |
| 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |