H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Christina Mchale vs Elena Vesnina H2H: 1-3
Elena Vesnina holds a 3–1 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Elena Vesnina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Vesnina won the 2017 Doha third round 5-7 6-3 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2017* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Elena Vesnina | 5-7 6-3 7-6(7) | Christina Mchale | Match data |
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Elena Vesnina | 7-6(0) 4-6 6-3 | Christina Mchale | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2012* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Elena Vesnina | 6-1 1-6 7-5 | Christina Mchale | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2012* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 6-3 7-5 | Elena Vesnina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Elena Vesnina | #573 | #13 | 3,320 | 1,858 | 262 | 260 | 50.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christina Mchale | Elena Vesnina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #47 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #54 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #79 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #23 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #57 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #64 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #115 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #16 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #18 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #137 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #310 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |