H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Christina Mchale vs Jie Zheng H2H: 1-0
Christina Mchale holds a 1–0 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Christina Mchale leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Christina Mchale won the 2014 Miami first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2014* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 6-4 6-2 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christina Mchale | Jie Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |