H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Christina Mchale vs Rosalie Van Der Hoek.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | 6-3 6-3 | Rosalie Van Der Hoek | Match data | Jun 8, 2019 | Q1 | Libéma Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 167 | 210 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rosalie Van Der Hoek | — | — | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christina Mchale | Rosalie Van Der Hoek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #45 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #64 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,453 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Christina Mchale | Rosalie Van Der Hoek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1499 | 112.0 | -1.43 | -0.60 | 0.927 | 48.4% | +20 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.14 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 1558 | 114.8 | -0.88 | -1.14 | 0.895 | 47.6% | +8 | -2 | — | 38.2% | -0.77 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–0 | — | +1.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 1718 | 138.4 | +1.67 | -0.12 | 0.999 | 49.9% | -36 | -92 | -111 | 49.4% | -0.19 | 6–5 (55%) | 9–3 (75%) | 105.5 | -0.79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 1669 | 131.2 | +1.31 | -0.92 | 0.962 | 49.2% | +12 | -8 | -43 | 50.5% | -0.06 | 10–9 (53%) | 2–6 (25%) | 98.5 | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 1633 | 129.7 | +0.29 | -1.34 | 0.964 | 49.2% | +46 | -17 | -42 | 45.9% | -0.43 | 4–8 (33%) | 4–2 (67%) | 97.6 | +0.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 1648 | 128.3 | +0.05 | +0.06 | 0.998 | 49.9% | +21 | -20 | -61 | 46.9% | -0.16 | 9–9 (50%) | 3–9 (25%) | 95.2 | -0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 1624 | 117.2 | -1.05 | -2.81 | 0.869 | 47.3% | -8 | -19 | +3 | 48.2% | -0.42 | 5–8 (38%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.01 | 2018 | 1485 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 1689 | 132.8 | -0.26 | +1.86 | 1.022 | 50.6% | -20 | -71 | +21 | 50.9% | +0.02 | 13–9 (59%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.3 | -0.48 | 2019 | 1463 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 1682 | 134.3 | -0.73 | +0.47 | 0.992 | 50.0% | +22 | -90 | -13 | 45.4% | -0.08 | 7–11 (39%) | 2–12 (14%) | 87.9 | -0.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 1565 | 113.9 | -3.09 | -1.16 | 0.882 | 47.4% | +18 | -24 | — | 33.9% | -0.96 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–4 (43%) | 94.3 | -0.53 | 2021 | 1435 | 88.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 1652 | 124.8 | -2.57 | +1.92 | 0.974 | 49.2% | +43 | — | — | 39.0% | -0.42 | 5–2 (71%) | 0–2 | — | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 1675 | 129.3 | -0.85 | -0.02 | 0.915 | 48.3% | +51 | -150 | — | 45.5% | -0.55 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 1526 | 113.1 | -3.71 | -1.23 | 0.828 | 45.8% | +71 | -40 | -50 | 25.6% | -1.56 | 0–7 (0%) | 5–2 (71%) | 95.3 | -0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 1453 | 96.2 | +3.05 | -2.38 | 0.600 | 38.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 1428 | 103.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1804 | 132.0 | -0.48 | -0.28 | 0.953 | 49.0% | +13 | -42 | -28 | 45.1% | -0.35 | 67–80 (46%) | 40–48 (45%) | 94.6 | -0.73 | — | 1500 | 91.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 3 | 6 | 9 | Jun 1, 2021 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 3 | 4 | 7 | Apr 15, 2021 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 1, 2019 | H2H |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jul 6, 2017 | H2H |
| Zarina Diyas | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 15, 2021 | H2H |
No career rivalry data available.